Remember me
▼ Content

Unorthodox opinion on climate change


Unorthodox opinion on climate change04-10-2017 22:46
climatedebate1136
☆☆☆☆☆
(1)
Hi all,

I'm with a top Los Angeles-based news and entertainment publication with an audience of 40+ million, and I'm looking for specific people who might be interested in being interviewed about climate change.

We're looking to interview people for some new programming. The premise is to talk to people whose beliefs differ entirely from who they are or what one might expect them to believe. In relation to climate change, this could be a scientist or someone in a scientific field who's a skeptic, or a Republican who believes climate change is real.

Being based in southern California is preferable, but not required. Feel free to shoot me a message if you're interested and feel like you fit the mold and we'll take it from there.

Thanks,

Sean
04-10-2017 23:10
James_
★★★☆☆
(590)
I think the North Atlantic and Gakkel Ridges have a lot to do with warming. 1910 - 1945 suggests this. Our position around the Sun can change during an ice age and during a warming period like now. Depleted ozone layer allows in extra heat and the IPCC and NOAA both agree we need co2 to support the ozone layer. Am pursuing an experiment to show that CO2 + H2O > CH2O and O2 which the O2 would become a part of the Chapman cycle. Just takes floating a weather balloon that's under inflated with 4 gases (one is water / vapor). If ch2o occurs then it would show something new in atmospheric chemistry. The IPCC acknowledges they do not know where CCl4 is coming from and this experiment might help to explain it.
And most likely you have some other agenda but since I have been making my opinion known why stop now ?
06-10-2017 17:28
Wake
★★★★★
(2226)
climatedebate1136 wrote:
Hi all,

I'm with a top Los Angeles-based news and entertainment publication with an audience of 40+ million, and I'm looking for specific people who might be interested in being interviewed about climate change.

We're looking to interview people for some new programming. The premise is to talk to people whose beliefs differ entirely from who they are or what one might expect them to believe. In relation to climate change, this could be a scientist or someone in a scientific field who's a skeptic, or a Republican who believes climate change is real.

Being based in southern California is preferable, but not required. Feel free to shoot me a message if you're interested and feel like you fit the mold and we'll take it from there.

Thanks,

Sean


Sean, you appear to be biased in favor of man-made global warming.

Question: why have we had warn periods more severe than this one every thousand years for at least the last 3,000 years and this one not only started right on schedule but more than 50 years before man could have any significant effect and the media totally ignores those facts?

Question: When we know that CO2 cannot have the effects ascribed to it by people like Dr. Michael Mann who has faked his data and is presently in a lawsuit concerning that why does the media continue to assert the claims of Mann and others?

Question: When there is no possible way that 97% of "all scientists" could agree on anything why is that lie continued by the media? When scientists are proclaiming that their papers have been taken out of context and that they are NOT agreeing with AGW why is this not made public by the media?

Virtually every point that is behind this hoax of AGW is palpably false and the environmentalists and the media is perpetrating this on the public. This needs to stop and yet your posting appears to be looking for more support for AGW rather than the truth.
09-10-2017 16:11
Wake
★★★★★
(2226)
climatedebate1136 wrote:
Hi all,

I'm with a top Los Angeles-based news and entertainment publication with an audience of 40+ million, and I'm looking for specific people who might be interested in being interviewed about climate change.

We're looking to interview people for some new programming. The premise is to talk to people whose beliefs differ entirely from who they are or what one might expect them to believe. In relation to climate change, this could be a scientist or someone in a scientific field who's a skeptic, or a Republican who believes climate change is real.

Being based in southern California is preferable, but not required. Feel free to shoot me a message if you're interested and feel like you fit the mold and we'll take it from there.

Thanks,

Sean


The question is: did you simply tun for cover or are you looking into the truth of the matter? Are you going to follow the papers published by NASA and NOAA or are you going to discover things like:

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/ir-expert-speaks-out-after-40-years-of-silence-its-the-water-vapor-stupid-and-not-the-co2/

Fear tactics are nothing new. The power of the press is to see advertising and in this the reporting of death to come sells more than anything else:

https://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/050/mwr-050-11-0589a.pdf

Here they are in all their glory:

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/cru-temperature-fraud/

Here is an honest article about the reduction in mid-latitude glaciers. At least he MENTIONS that they formed in the little ice age. Don't you think that after this cooling period ended that they hugely advanced glaciers would melt?

http://www.nichols.edu/departments/glacier/glacier_retreat.htm

If you want to really talk about climate change you could actually publish the truth about it. If the media would allow you.
09-10-2017 17:39
litesong
★★★★☆
(1505)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed:..... you could actually publish the truth...

I always publish the truth that "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.
09-10-2017 18:10
Wake
★★★★★
(2226)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed:..... you could actually publish the truth...

I always publish the truth that "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.


https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/epa-chief-says-administration-roll-150239621.html

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/1/15726472/trump-tweets-global-warming-paris-climate-agreement

https://www.voanews.com/a/reports-trump-to-pull-out-of-paris-climate-agreement/3878950.html

The sleezy whining pukey lying pile of doggy doo-doo that pretends to have Indian heritage is losing on every single front.

Even the Montana Indians want the money from oil more than they are worried about "tainted aquifers". Tell us you little sissy - why don't you tell us all about how we threatened your wife when no one even guessed that a transvestite could have one?
09-10-2017 18:50
litesong
★★★★☆
(1505)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs:... pretends.....


I always publish the truth. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" pretends it is human, but continually proves it is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.
Meanwhile:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" fulfills its promise to ignore me.
09-10-2017 19:04
litesong
★★★★☆
(1505)
[b]Wake wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/epa-chief-says-administration-roll-150239621.html[/url]

Pruit's determination to destroy the EPA, includes illegal & wasteful use of gov't funds:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/06/politics/epa-expands-pruitt-investigation/index.html
09-10-2017 22:19
litesong
★★★★☆
(1505)
[b]Wake wrote: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/1/15726472/trump-tweets-global-warming-paris-climate-agreement

The first Nov. 1, 2011 "don'T rump" tweet, talkin' about snow in New York.....
The Arctic had been fairly normal for many months BEFORE the "don'T rump" tweet. However, strong warming invaded the nearly 4 million square mile High Arctic (leaping 10degC), thrusting Arctic cold to the south. Meeting a moist front, the Arctic cold caused New York snow.
10-10-2017 15:01
Wake
★★★★★
(2226)
litesong wrote:
[b]Wake wrote: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/1/15726472/trump-tweets-global-warming-paris-climate-agreement

The first Nov. 1, 2011 "don'T rump" tweet, talkin' about snow in New York.....
The Arctic had been fairly normal for many months BEFORE the "don'T rump" tweet. However, strong warming invaded the nearly 4 million square mile High Arctic (leaping 10degC), thrusting Arctic cold to the south. Meeting a moist front, the Arctic cold caused New York snow.


What is going to be funny is when there is no longer a single branch of government left that is going to practice the sort of lies and deceit that make up your very small world.
10-10-2017 16:09
litesong
★★★★☆
(1505)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]Wake wrote: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/1/15726472/trump-tweets-global-warming-paris-climate-agreement

The first Nov. 1, 2011 "don'T rump" tweet, talkin' about snow in New York.....
The Arctic had been fairly normal for many months BEFORE the "don'T rump" tweet. However, strong warming invaded the nearly 4 million square mile High Arctic (leaping 10degC), thrusting Arctic cold to the south. Meeting a moist front, the Arctic cold caused New York snow.

What is going to be funny is when there is no longer a single branch of government left that is going to practice the sort of lies and deceit that make up your very small world.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" loves AGW denier liar whiner pressy-ee-dent "don'T rump", who ascended to the toilet-throne of the kkk(always small letters), & is now the "grand wizard". Proof that such occurred is david duke had to step down as "grand wizard" & can only mumble, "me too, me too! Don't ferget get me, "don'T rump".




Join the debate Unorthodox opinion on climate change:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Opinion Poll for final thesis Climate change and automobile industry212-06-2017 19:23
Bill Gates opinion on climate change - Discuss329-10-2015 21:41
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Will Arctic summers be ice-free in this century?

Yes

No

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact