Remember me
▼ Content

There is still no Global Warming science.



Page 4 of 4<<<234
08-10-2015 19:40
IBdaMann
★★★★★
(3109)
climate scientist wrote: I posted the link to the Venus and Earth temperature vs pressure profiles for everyone to see ...

You are apparently not making progress getting over the religion-science discernability hump. A link to the preacher's sermon is not scientific/math/logical support for the sermon. Religion is not science.

climate scientist wrote: Yes. O3 absorbs infrared because it is a greenhouse gas!

Nope, you can't (validly) say that any gas is a "greenhouse gas" whose properties cause a "greenhouse effect" because you have no "greenhouse effect" that doesn't violate the laws of physics.

At best you can assert that there are some gases that your religion has declared have mystical, magical superpowers


climate scientist wrote:
We don't even have a defined "greenhouse effect" that doesn't violate the 1st LoT such that any atmospheric gases have any properties that cause it.


Can you provide a link/reference to back up this statement?

Simply not having any such definition is sufficient. After all, you were the one who was supposed to provide it and it never materialized, hence, we don't have one.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
08-10-2015 19:55
trafnProfile picture★★★☆☆
(779)
Oh dear, dear climate scientist,

Is it better to endure the slings and arrows of the childish behavior of those who employ Religion, Repetitiveness and Redundancy - the preferred Three R's of the climate science illiterate!

Or, should we just leave them in the corner and ignore them like the immature little children that they are?

Your non-response would say it all!




The 2015 M2C2 (Global 9/11) Denialist Troll Awards

1st Place - Jep Branner - Our Stupid Administrator!
2nd Place - IBdaMann - Science IS cherry picking!
3rd Place - Into the Night - Mr. Nonsense numbers!
4th Place - Tim the plumber - The Drivel Queen!
08-10-2015 20:11
IBdaMann
★★★★★
(3109)
trafn wrote:
Oh dear, dear climate scientist,

Is it better to endure the slings and arrows of the childish behavior of those who employ Religion, Repetitiveness and Redundancy - the preferred Three R's of the climate science illiterate!

Or, should we just leave them in the corner and ignore them like the immature little children that they are?

Your non-response would say it all!


Congratulations! You have just reduced your position to one big ad hominem. It's amazing what you will consider to be clever, especially when it comes from another member of your church.

Perhaps I'll never understand the sheer death-struggle to drive offending science away. I understand you need to try everything in the book, every ad homien, every evasive maneuver, etc.. but why the hate?! It's just science. Is it really that traumatic?


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
08-10-2015 20:11
climate scientist
★★☆☆☆
(257)
NON-RESPONSE: please feel free to go sit in the corner!
08-10-2015 20:13
trafnProfile picture★★★☆☆
(779)
NON-RESPONSE: please feel free to go sit in the corner!




The 2015 M2C2 (Global 9/11) Denialist Troll Awards

1st Place - Jep Branner - Our Stupid Administrator!
2nd Place - IBdaMann - Science IS cherry picking!
3rd Place - Into the Night - Mr. Nonsense numbers!
4th Place - Tim the plumber - The Drivel Queen!
08-10-2015 20:19
IBdaMann
★★★★★
(3109)
climate scientist wrote:
NON-RESPONSE: please feel free to go sit in the corner!

I'm loving this Marxist solidarity thing. It says it all. Thanks.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
08-10-2015 20:23
trafnProfile picture★★★☆☆
(779)
You are most welcome, Kemosabe!




The 2015 M2C2 (Global 9/11) Denialist Troll Awards

1st Place - Jep Branner - Our Stupid Administrator!
2nd Place - IBdaMann - Science IS cherry picking!
3rd Place - Into the Night - Mr. Nonsense numbers!
4th Place - Tim the plumber - The Drivel Queen!
08-10-2015 20:26
drm
★☆☆☆☆
(67)
trafn wrote::


08-10-2015 20:45
IBdaMann
★★★★★
(3109)



Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Page 4 of 4<<<234





Join the debate There is still no Global Warming science.:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Sometimes I doubt the science ...511-07-2018 06:09
Does 97% of science agree?917-12-2017 01:24
The Science of Doom922-11-2017 05:53
Reddit's science forum banned climate deniers. Why don't all newspapers do the same? (2013)921-11-2017 19:25
Science daily.com - hydrogen sulphide1308-10-2017 20:44
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact