Remember me
▼ Content

The moment of Mann is fast approaching


The moment of Mann is fast approaching03-01-2018 21:14
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
Dr. Michael Mann has sued several scientists for disagreeing with him. These cases are slowly grinding through the legal process but what is clear is that rather than approach these lawsuits honestly he has been playing a waiting game. Probably to get enough seniority in his Penn. State University office to retire before he is shown as the incompetent fakir he is.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446295/michael-mann-house-testimony-climate-change-embarrassing-rude

Sitting before Congress he attempts to make himself the slighted person. He who has caused Trillions of dollars to be spent for or against him.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/business/aly-nielsen/2017/09/12/michael-mann-ibd-editors-inhuman-cretins-climate-change

Mann continues to call people names rather than provide scientific proof of anything.

For those unaware of it he has sued Dr. Peter Bell in Canadian courts. Bell stood up to him. Obviously Mann thought that Bell would crawl for forgiveness because instead of presenting his case, Mann cried for time to prepare. If he sued shouldn't he already have been prepared? The postponement of the case was accepted by the defense on the grounds that Dr. Mann supply the dataset he used for his famous Hockey Stick chart.

The reason is that Mann never published this data and all criticized his work for many reasons having to do with the missing and known climate conditions.

For instance: Missing from the Hockey Stick was the Medieval Warm Period and the Maunder Minimum (the little ice age). The first was warmer than today while the second would have demonstrated that climate extremes are neither unexpected or unusual.

Mann's excuse for the missing extremes were that they were only a localized feature of Europe. Well, there are both historical records and geological records from all over the world that demonstrate that these were world wide events.

But if you could claim these to be localized events they would become nothing more than the chaotic weather events and therefore it would discount the Sun as the source of these events. And continuous studies from as far back as the 19th century have identified sunspot cycles with large climate variations.

https://history.aip.org/climate/solar.htm

Commanded by the court to supply his data Dr. Michael Mann did not. We can expect the court to frown upon Mann's move when the court reconvenes soon. And that will probably take the shape of Mann having his case thrown out without comment and also being charged for all legal expenses of both Dr. Bell and the Canadian courts which frown upon their courts being abused.

https://www.iceagenow.info/looks-like-michael-hockey-stick-mann-sabotaged-lawsuit-dr-ball/

It appears that more and more scientists are speaking up and virtually ALL of them refute the AGW True Believer's claims.

http://notrickszone.com/global-warming-disputed-300-graphs/#sthash.WiG0rDYh.dpbs
03-01-2018 23:16
L8112
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Probably to get enough seniority in his Penn. State University office to retire before he is.
Dr. Michael Mann has sued several scientists for disagreeing with him. These cases are slowly grinding through the legal process but what is clear is that rather than approach the incompetent fakir he is shown as the incompetent fakir he is.
Dr. Michael Mann has been playing a waiting game.
Edited on 03-01-2018 23:33
25-01-2018 22:37
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
L8112 wrote:
Probably to get enough seniority in his Penn. State University office to retire before he is.
Dr. Michael Mann has sued several scientists for disagreeing with him. These cases are slowly grinding through the legal process but what is clear is that rather than approach the incompetent fakir he is shown as the incompetent fakir he is.
Dr. Michael Mann has been playing a waiting game.


Mann sued Patrick Bell once and it was thrown out of Canadian courts. He tried a second time and although he obviously thought it too would be thrown out the judge accepted it. With a surprised look on his face he asked for time to prepare his case (if you don't have a case to begin with why would you need to have time to prepare one?) The defense agreed as long as Mann supplied the data he used to develop the hocky stick.

After a reasonable amount of time Mann did not supply the data which will put him in contempt of court when it reconvenes. I have been trying to discover when that would be but have been unsuccessful.

But in the process I have discovered that Mann is no stranger to the courts system in British Columbia. Let's just say that most people do not like him and he returns the favor. I especially note two women in a fairly short period of time that must have been divorce cases.

Most of Mann's critics have accused him of claiming that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age were only local climatic effects. These they were absolutely not. We have recorded and geologic evidence from every continent that showed that they were in fact world wide.

But IF you can call them local events you can disregard changes in Sun emissions as the source of the temperature events.

At least two studies have pined the temperature changes we can trace to variations in the Sun's output. The match is almost exactly correct.




Join the debate The moment of Mann is fast approaching:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Climate Documentary: The Cross of the Moment228-05-2018 21:54
Climate Change Denial in the Age of Trump - Michael Mann127-05-2018 07:29
"Why is America melting so fast?"822-05-2018 15:55
"Why Is Everything Melting So Fast??"421-05-2018 05:26
Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice40306-03-2018 14:36
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact