The End of the World

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed:... drools as he writes this stuff?

Wake wrote:
With the nutcakes predicting the end of the world on September 23 when a large asteriod/mini-planet strikes the Earth I surprised that the True Believers and Nightmare aren't swapping "science" to prove or disprove it.

Nightmare recently gave us another of his own definitions of "light" - any radiation according to him is light. Light isn't the actual definition of being in the normal light bands of between 4 x 10^14 and 8 x 10^14 Hz as any scientist could tell you. Rather it is anything at all including the warmth of his butt on the seat cushion of his computer chair.

I wonder if he actually drools as he writes this stuff?

Wake wrote:
With the nutcakes predicting the end of the world on September 23 when a large asteriod/mini-planet strikes the Earth I surprised that the True Believers and Nightmare aren't swapping "science" to prove or disprove it.

Nightmare recently gave us another of his own definitions of "light" - any radiation according to him is light. Light isn't the actual definition of being in the normal light bands of between 4 x 10^14 and 8 x 10^14 Hz as any scientist could tell you. Rather it is anything at all including the warmth of his butt on the seat cushion of his computer chair.

I wonder if he actually drools as he writes this stuff?

GreenMan wrote:

Wake wrote:
With the nutcakes predicting the end of the world on September 23 when a large asteriod/mini-planet strikes the Earth I surprised that the True Believers and Nightmare aren't swapping "science" to prove or disprove it.

Nightmare recently gave us another of his own definitions of "light" - any radiation according to him is light. Light isn't the actual definition of being in the normal light bands of between 4 x 10^14 and 8 x 10^14 Hz as any scientist could tell you. Rather it is anything at all including the warmth of his butt on the seat cushion of his computer chair.

I wonder if he actually drools as he writes this stuff?

That prophecy is funny. Looks like people would realize that if a planet was really heading our way, that someone would have seen it by now. But you can't fix stupid.

Which reminds me of why I bothered to respond to this ridiculous post.

Parrot Killer is actually right about any radiation is light, though on another thread he said radiance was heat.

GreenMan wrote:
So I'm sure he has some "issues," but he is right about radiation being light. It is, whether you can see it or not, it is still considered light. What you are talking about is "visible light." If it weren't for invisible light, we wouldn't even need that term.

You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

Wake wrote:
With the nutcakes predicting the end of the world on September 23 when a large asteriod/mini-planet strikes the Earth I surprised that the True Believers and Nightmare aren't swapping "science" to prove or disprove it.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed:... the planet they are walking on no longer exists!

GreenMan wrote:

Wake wrote:
With the nutcakes predicting the end of the world on September 23 when a large asteriod/mini-planet strikes the Earth I surprised that the True Believers and Nightmare aren't swapping "science" to prove or disprove it.

Nightmare recently gave us another of his own definitions of "light" - any radiation according to him is light. Light isn't the actual definition of being in the normal light bands of between 4 x 10^14 and 8 x 10^14 Hz as any scientist could tell you. Rather it is anything at all including the warmth of his butt on the seat cushion of his computer chair.

I wonder if he actually drools as he writes this stuff?

That prophecy is funny. Looks like people would realize that if a planet was really heading our way, that someone would have seen it by now. But you can't fix stupid.

Which reminds me of why I bothered to respond to this ridiculous post.

Parrot Killer is actually right about any radiation is light, though on another thread he said radiance was heat. So I'm sure he has some "issues," but he is right about radiation being light. It is, whether you can see it or not, it is still considered light. What you are talking about is "visible light." If it weren't for invisible light, we wouldn't even need that term.

You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

Wake wrote:
Radiated energy is not "light" which is a limited bandwidth of radiated energy. Or a subset of energy if you will. It can be referred to as "heat" since that is the source of all energy. But it is normally referred to by the frequencies that it covers. Maybe you'd call AM radio frequencies "heat" but I wouldn't.