| Desertphile | Scientific Consensus |


Posts: 30 Joined: 15.02.11 |
Posted on 15-02-2011 01:58 |
All of the scientists on the planet agree AGW happened and is happening:
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686# http://www.post-carbon-living.com/TTHW/Documents/Climate_Change_Consensus.pdf http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/ http://aas.org/governance/resolutions.php%23climate#climate http://portal.acs.org/portal/fileFetch/C/WPCP_011538/pdf/WPCP_011538.pdf http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/positions/climate_change2008.shtml http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2007climatechange.html http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/07_1.cfm http://www.australiancoralreefsociety.org/pdf/chadwick605a.pdf http://www.amos.org.au/publications/cid/3/t/publications http://www.csiro.com.au/resources/State-of-the-Climate.html http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/science/climate/position-statement.php http://cfcas.org/pressrelease1Dec05e.htm http://www.cmos.ca/climatechangepole.html http://epa.gov/climatechange/index.html http://www.eurogeologists.de/images/content/panels_of_experts/co2_geological_storage/CCS_position_paper.pdf http://www.egu.eu/fileadmin/files/egustatement.pdf http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:rXA5d27-secJ:academiaeuropaea.ift.uib.no/physics/EPS-2.pdf+European+Physical+Society+position+nuclear+option+papers&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari http://www.fas.org/press/statements/_docs/08grand_challenges.html http://www.fasts.org/images/policy-discussion/statement-climate-change.pdf http://www.geosociety.org/positions/position10.htm http://www.gsa.org.au/pdfdocuments/management/GreenhouseGasEmissions&ClimateChange_GSAPositionStatement_July2009.pdf http://www.inqua.tcd.ie/documents/iscc.pdf http://www.iugg.org/resolutions/perugia07.pdf http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html http://www.rmets.org/news/detail.php?ID=332 http://royalsociety.org/landing.asp?id=1278 http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/Site/news/media_releases/2008/clim0708.aspx http://www.aktualnosci.pan.pl/images/stories/pliki/stanowiska_opinie/2008/stanowisko_pan_131207.pdf http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2010/20100127_TemperatureFinal.pdf http://www.rmets.org/pdf/qjcallender38.pdf http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/climate/files/2009/10/broeckerglobalwarming75.pdf http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6826/abs/410355a0.html http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,937403,00.html
|
| Hayduke | RE: Climate variation |


Posts: 23 Location: Santa Cruz, California Joined: 15.02.11 |
Posted on 15-02-2011 17:34 |
[quote]Desertphile wrote: All of the scientists on the planet agree AGW happened and is happening:
This statement is absolutely and unequivocally false. Many climate scientists disagree that human produced CO2 is the cause of climate change. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a politically loaded, unscientific phrase that does not describe the complexity of global climate variation.
|
| Desertphile | RE: Scientific Consensus |


Posts: 30 Joined: 15.02.11 |
Posted on 15-02-2011 19:52 |
|
Hayduke wrote: This statement is absolutely and unequivocally false.
No. Over 550 science organizations in 85 countries, and they all agree humans have caused and are causing global warming.
Hayduke wrote: Many climate scientists disagree that human produced CO2 is the cause of climate change.
Name five. (This ought to be good for a laugh.)
Hayduke wrote: Anthropogenic Global Warming is a politically loaded, unscientific phrase that does not describe the complexity of global climate variation.
It is an observed fact, no less than evolution and gravity. If you insist upon seeing it as "politically loaded" and "unscientific," that's your own special emotional illness and you should probably talk to a mental health care professional about it.
|
| Hayduke | RE: Persoanl attacks |


Posts: 23 Location: Santa Cruz, California Joined: 15.02.11 |
Posted on 15-02-2011 22:17 |
|
Name five. (This ought to be good for a laugh.)
It is an observed fact, no less than evolution and gravity. If you insist upon seeing it as "politically loaded" and "unscientific," that's your own special emotional illness and you should probably talk to a mental health care professional about it.
I do not respond to personal attacks.
|