Rising sea levels

Daft yank wrote:
This will not address human's contribution to global warming but in terms of rising sea levels could increasing the number of water treatment plants that convert sea water into fresh water through the process of osmosis.then we could fix the lack of access to fresh water on continents such as Africa but also we could use a substantial amount of converted sea water to maintain the the 100's of millions of trees needed to be planted in order to regulate the excess heat in our atmosphere. We would need at least 1000 water conversion plants and they could be payed for using the controversial carbon tax system.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Plants don't use the green wavelengths, leaves reflect them, that's what we see. Plants use red and blue. The also like a lot of CO2, and a warmer climate. There really is no man-made crisis here, everything is working toward a better planet, stronger, healthier plants, that produce more food for all living things.

Daft yank wrote:
This will not address human's contribution to global warming but in terms of rising sea levels could increasing the number of water treatment plants that convert sea water into fresh water through the process of osmosis.then we could fix the lack of access to fresh water on continents such as Africa but also we could use a substantial amount of converted sea water to maintain the the 100's of millions of trees needed to be planted in order to regulate the excess heat in our atmosphere. We would need at least 1000 water conversion plants and they could be payed for using the controversial carbon tax system.

James___ wrote:

Daft yank wrote:
This will not address human's contribution to global warming but in terms of rising sea levels could increasing the number of water treatment plants that convert sea water into fresh water through the process of osmosis.then we could fix the lack of access to fresh water on continents such as Africa but also we could use a substantial amount of converted sea water to maintain the the 100's of millions of trees needed to be planted in order to regulate the excess heat in our atmosphere. We would need at least 1000 water conversion plants and they could be payed for using the controversial carbon tax system.

I'll bite on this you d@mned Yankee because I'm from Ohio. Off with your head I say. We'll keel haul ya after we make you walk the plank!!! Friggin' land lovers.
You did mention individual facts which are correct. Can't say CO2 is responsible for warming and neither did you.
Green does refract solar radiation at a cooler temperature. Sea levels are rising. Before I become concerned about that, I'd need to know how that effects Elliot Bay in Seattle, WA.
It's been observed to be rising there since the 1800's. You can take the fairy (ITN) in Seattle.
Has it's rate of rise increased since 1950? This hasn't been mentioned in any CO2 warming scenario. This would help to differentiate between natural climate variation and man made warming.

If people accept physical observations then a simple question is if the rising tide in Seattle matches rising CO2 levels. That could be a "smoking gun" per se if you will.

There is a reason why the colour green refracts solar radiation at a lower temperature. It's being absorbed by I think the cytoplast to produce carbohydrates like glucose which is C6H12O6. That's if you get into organic chemistry which I don't.

keepit wrote:
"Freshwater on the continent of Africa".

Actually since the population of africa is projected to grow so much there is projected to be water shortages.
On the other hand, beneath the sahara desert there exists the largest aquifer in the world.
I expect they'll find an efficient way to access it when the time comes.

keepit wrote: Actually since the population of africa is projected to grow so much there is projected to be water shortages.

keepit wrote: On the other hand, beneath the sahara desert there exists the largest aquifer in the world.

keepit wrote:I expect they'll find an efficient way to access it when the time comes.

keepit wrote: The United Nations projected this.

keepit wrote: I don't think it's sensible to dismiss so many things that don't comport with the"Manual".

keepit wrote: I don't know where the"Manual" came from. Never even heard of it before.

keepit wrote: This issue about SB law.
I still don't get your interpretation.

keepit wrote: Just thinking here - it seems to me that the SB law refers to an ideal Black Body.

keepit wrote: I think it's a fair analogy to say that greenhouse gasses make earth not an ideal Black Body in the same sense.

keepit wrote: What scientist or organization claims the UN has no credibility?

keepit wrote: Did the "Manual" get produced by climate scientists? Which climate scientists?

keepit wrote: He had a couple of defects though - he was sure that the United Nations had secret military bases hidden in the forests.

keepit wrote:
The United Nations projected this.
I don't think it's sensible to dismiss so many things that don't comport with the"Manual".
I don't know where the"Manual" came from. Never even heard of it before.

keepit wrote:
This issue about SB law.
I still don't get your interpretation.

keepit wrote:
Just thinking here - it seems to me that the SB law refers to an ideal Black Body.

keepit wrote:
Look at Newton's idea of time and space. They were an ideal point of view.

keepit wrote:
I think it's a fair analogy to say that greenhouse gasses make earth not an ideal Black Body in the same sense.

keepit wrote:
Is "fortune telling" and which "entrails" appropriate responses to UN projections?

keepit wrote:
What scientist or organization claims the UN has no credibility?
Did the "Manual" get produced by climate scientists? Which climate scientists?

keepit wrote:Did the "Manual" get produced by climate scientists? Which climate scientists?

IBdaMann wrote:

keepit wrote:Did the "Manual" get produced by climate scientists? Which climate scientists?

Yes, in a sense. "Climate Scientists" inspired the content.

There were three main drivers to The Manual being what it is today:

1. Into the Night's ongoing dedication to information integrity inspired his creation of the "Word Smithy," a micro-forum in which semantics are thoroughly scrutinized, i.e. an incubator for truth and coherence of thought. Much of the core warmizombie doctrine was put under the semantic microscope and examined thoroughly.

2. Demand for the enlightening clarity thus produced grew on other boards, to includes requests for a separate MANUAL to help people navigate the confusing and often contradictory semantics filling the Church of Global Warming.

3. The content in The Manual was presented to hundreds of expert warmizombies and "Climate Scientists" who could find no inaccuracies ... except for one minor wording quibble that was fixed on the spot. Just like mainstream Muslims don't appreciate the Q'ran being translated into something other than Arabic, few warmizombies appreciated their Global Warming doctrine being translated into plain English. Nonetheless, none of it has been found to be inaccurate. The Manual received over a thousand hits in less than two weeks by people referencing it in Global Warming / Climate Change fora. There was no surprise that The Manual was accurate because the content came from all of them, from their posts on the Global Warming / Climate Change fora.

So all should feel free to use it in full confidence of the veracity of the content.