Racist Sexist Xenophobic AND Erroneous "don'T rump" Pratfalls

litesong wrote:
http://grist.org/briefly/federal-officials-accidentally-emailed-a-reporter-their-plans-to-spin-puerto-rico/
From the article:
Federal officials accidentally emailed a reporter their plans to spin Puerto Rico.
In late September, the Pentagon included a Bloomberg News climate reporter Christopher Flavelle on a series of emails meant for Pentagon employees.
The emails detail talking points for convincing the public that the White House's response to Puerto Rico was going well. Just one minor problem: It so wasn't. Many Puerto Ricans have gone without power, clean water, and adequate food ever since Hurricane Maria hit last month.

litesong wrote:
http://grist.org/briefly/federal-officials-accidentally-emailed-a-reporter-their-plans-to-spin-puerto-rico/
From the article:
Federal officials accidentally emailed a reporter their plans to spin Puerto Rico.
In late September, the Pentagon included a Bloomberg News climate reporter Christopher Flavelle on a series of emails meant for Pentagon employees.
The emails detail talking points for convincing the public that the White House's response to Puerto Rico was going well. Just one minor problem: It so wasn't. Many Puerto Ricans have gone without power, clean water, and adequate food ever since Hurricane Maria hit last month.

James_ wrote:...not sure why litesong doesn't like President rump.

litesong wrote:

James_ wrote:...not sure why litesong doesn't like President rump.

I'm not a rump man. But I know "don'T rump" when I see it.

James_ wrote:

litesong wrote:
http://grist.org/briefly/federal-officials-accidentally-emailed-a-reporter-their-plans-to-spin-puerto-rico/
From the article:
Federal officials accidentally emailed a reporter their plans to spin Puerto Rico.
In late September, the Pentagon included a Bloomberg News climate reporter Christopher Flavelle on a series of emails meant for Pentagon employees.
The emails detail talking points for convincing the public that the White House's response to Puerto Rico was going well. Just one minor problem: It so wasn't. Many Puerto Ricans have gone without power, clean water, and adequate food ever since Hurricane Maria hit last month.

Here is a link to the reporter's story on bloomberg. Just not sure why litesong doesn't like President rump.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-13/how-the-pentagon-spun-hurricane-maria

litesong wrote:

James_ wrote:...not sure why litesong doesn't like President rump.

I'm not a rump man. But I know "don'T rump" when I see it.

James_ wrote:

litesong wrote:

James_ wrote:...not sure why litesong doesn't like President rump.

I'm not a rump man. But I know "don'T rump" when I see it.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" wiffed: I'm not a vinod man

GasGuzzler wrote:
I found the butchering chart to be slightly inaccurate and incomplete. I have updated it. See how easy it is to screw with the "facts"?

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed:.... illegal alien..... turn the SOB in.

litesong wrote:

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed:.... illegal alien..... turn the SOB in.

If the illegal alien isn't russian, deportation is the un-best "don'T rump" trash action.
If the illegal alien is a russian hacker troll, "don'T rump" gov't agents will let the russian hacker troll continue AND pin it with a "medal of freedom".

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: May be....

litesong wrote:

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: May be....

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" got its "may be" babel bubbling.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" bluffed: ....any second now.

litesong wrote:

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" bluffed: ....any second now.

"This ought to be a red flag warning to people that" (courtesy of "wake-me-up") do understand the climate that old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners threaten or take whatever measures to silence their opposition. The problem with "wake-me-up" is, it knows geography so little, it can't figure that Native Tribe reservations are often within the borders of the U.S.

Wake wrote: But of course an East Indian isn't a "native tribe member".

litesong wrote:

Wake wrote: But of course an East Indian isn't a "native tribe member".

Native Tribes are all over the world. The disasters of euros & transplanted euros pouring out of europe with their tech, make their genocides all the greater. Guess yer gov't agent HAD to retire due to its poor ability to find the right data.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: Tell that to the ICE agent.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gazzzed & guzzzling" guffed: Copynpaste?

: "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: I didn't read .....

GasGuzzler wrote:
And you claim you're not Chief Copynpaste?

I know nobody reads this crap. Hell, I didn't read it either. Just wanted to find out where you find your hooey.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/07/antarctica-sea-level-rise-climate-change/

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: This guy is an East Indian and is here on an expired visa..... Get this creature out of this country.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed:... wanted to find out where you find your hooey.

GasGuzzler wrote:
And you claim you're not Chief Copynpaste?

I know nobody reads this crap. Hell, I didn't read it either. Just wanted to find out where you find your hooey.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/07/antarctica-sea-level-rise-climate-change/

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
And you claim you're not Chief Copynpaste?

I know nobody reads this crap. Hell, I didn't read it either. Just wanted to find out where you find your hooey.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/07/antarctica-sea-level-rise-climate-change/

I've also read where one side is warming and the other side is cooling.

James_ wrote:
scientists have also said that the problems with Antarctica come from ozone depletion.

James_ wrote:
What we need to remember is that ozone cannot be created or destroyed.

James_ wrote:
Why you ask ? It's simple. I'll let Into the Night explain how our existence is a figment of our imagination (this actually falsifies us) so therefore we do not exist (because we have been falsified).

James_ wrote:
Really, we don't, we only believe that we exist.

James_ wrote:
And since we do not exist there is no climate and since there is no climate there is also no climate change.

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
And you claim you're not Chief Copynpaste?

I know nobody reads this crap. Hell, I didn't read it either. Just wanted to find out where you find your hooey.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/07/antarctica-sea-level-rise-climate-change/

I've also read where one side is warming and the other side is cooling.

[b]Wake wrote:It turned out to be a new undersea volcano had formed just off the shelf.

litesong wrote:

[b]Wake wrote:It turned out to be a new undersea volcano had formed just off the shelf.

old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" pretends that Antarctic underwater volcanoes are new AND cause extra melting. AGW denier liar whiners always find other things, other than AGW, that cause warming. However, AGW denier liar whiners have no science to prove that newly discovered volcanoes have produced any more heat than they probably did, BEFORE they were discovered.

Into the Night wrote:


Climate is weather over a long time. Most dictionaries use wording similar to this.

You can't define a 'climate change' quantitatively either. To describe a 'change', you must use fixed units of measurement. 'A long time' is not a fixed unit of time. With no fixed units of measurement, and no definition of 'global climate' that makes any sense, all you have for 'climate change' is a void argument. No theory can be based on a void argument.

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:


Climate is weather over a long time. Most dictionaries use wording similar to this.

You can't define a 'climate change' quantitatively either. To describe a 'change', you must use fixed units of measurement. 'A long time' is not a fixed unit of time. With no fixed units of measurement, and no definition of 'global climate' that makes any sense, all you have for 'climate change' is a void argument. No theory can be based on a void argument.

Time is a falsehood. It comes from the Church of Scientology who wants us to worship their Holy links. For there to be an argument first there must be a reality for it to exist in. Reality is a lie as we only believe that we exist while we do not. We're not really here, we just wrongly believe that we are.

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:


Climate is weather over a long time. Most dictionaries use wording similar to this.

You can't define a 'climate change' quantitatively either. To describe a 'change', you must use fixed units of measurement. 'A long time' is not a fixed unit of time. With no fixed units of measurement, and no definition of 'global climate' that makes any sense, all you have for 'climate change' is a void argument. No theory can be based on a void argument.

Time is a falsehood. It comes from the Church of Scientology who wants us to worship their Holy links. For there to be an argument first there must be a reality for it to exist in. Reality is a lie as we only believe that we exist while we do not. We're not really here, we just wrongly believe that we are.

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:


Climate is weather over a long time. Most dictionaries use wording similar to this.

You can't define a 'climate change' quantitatively either. To describe a 'change', you must use fixed units of measurement. 'A long time' is not a fixed unit of time. With no fixed units of measurement, and no definition of 'global climate' that makes any sense, all you have for 'climate change' is a void argument. No theory can be based on a void argument.

Time is a falsehood. It comes from the Church of Scientology who wants us to worship their Holy links. For there to be an argument first there must be a reality for it to exist in. Reality is a lie as we only believe that we exist while we do not. We're not really here, we just wrongly believe that we are.

Sarcasm received and noted. But he does have a point. In order to have a climate change you have to have a period of time over which it would change and since "climate" is undefinable in established terms (it is much warmer since the little ice age but it was much colder between the Medieval Warm Period and the little ice age) there is a great deal of difficulty establishing what is actually meant by climate change.

Homo sapiens appeared on Earth some 200,000 years ago as we were exiting an ice age into our present Interglacial period. Since he appears to have simultaneously appeared both in North Africa where the Sahara Desert was a rolling rain forest and the southern border of somewhere around China we can only say that Man is designed for cold weather and not warm.

Can you call the change from the ice age into the interglacial period climate change? Or a cyclic even that is PART of the climate.

Yeah, nightmare is full of crap when he says that science cannot measure mean global temperature (MGT) and he hasn't a clue about most matters scientific but he isn't speaking about science on this subject but philosophy. And in that he is as well prepared as anyone else.

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:


Climate is weather over a long time. Most dictionaries use wording similar to this.

You can't define a 'climate change' quantitatively either. To describe a 'change', you must use fixed units of measurement. 'A long time' is not a fixed unit of time. With no fixed units of measurement, and no definition of 'global climate' that makes any sense, all you have for 'climate change' is a void argument. No theory can be based on a void argument.

Time is a falsehood. It comes from the Church of Scientology who wants us to worship their Holy links. For there to be an argument first there must be a reality for it to exist in. Reality is a lie as we only believe that we exist while we do not. We're not really here, we just wrongly believe that we are.

Sarcasm received and noted. But he does have a point. In order to have a climate change you have to have a period of time over which it would change and since "climate" is undefinable in established terms (it is much warmer since the little ice age but it was much colder between the Medieval Warm Period and the little ice age) there is a great deal of difficulty establishing what is actually meant by climate change.

Homo sapiens appeared on Earth some 200,000 years ago as we were exiting an ice age into our present Interglacial period. Since he appears to have simultaneously appeared both in North Africa where the Sahara Desert was a rolling rain forest and the southern border of somewhere around China we can only say that Man is designed for cold weather and not warm.

Can you call the change from the ice age into the interglacial period climate change? Or a cyclic even that is PART of the climate.

Yeah, nightmare is full of crap when he says that science cannot measure mean global temperature (MGT) and he hasn't a clue about most matters scientific but he isn't speaking about science on this subject but philosophy. And in that he is as well prepared as anyone else.

Am being Into the Night

One way a climate might be referenced is by the flora and fauna. Arid regions are different than deserts just as rain forests are different as well.

Into the Night wrote:

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:


Climate is weather over a long time. Most dictionaries use wording similar to this.

You can't define a 'climate change' quantitatively either. To describe a 'change', you must use fixed units of measurement. 'A long time' is not a fixed unit of time. With no fixed units of measurement, and no definition of 'global climate' that makes any sense, all you have for 'climate change' is a void argument. No theory can be based on a void argument.

Time is a falsehood. It comes from the Church of Scientology who wants us to worship their Holy links. For there to be an argument first there must be a reality for it to exist in. Reality is a lie as we only believe that we exist while we do not. We're not really here, we just wrongly believe that we are.

Sarcasm received and noted. But he does have a point. In order to have a climate change you have to have a period of time over which it would change and since "climate" is undefinable in established terms (it is much warmer since the little ice age but it was much colder between the Medieval Warm Period and the little ice age) there is a great deal of difficulty establishing what is actually meant by climate change.

Homo sapiens appeared on Earth some 200,000 years ago as we were exiting an ice age into our present Interglacial period. Since he appears to have simultaneously appeared both in North Africa where the Sahara Desert was a rolling rain forest and the southern border of somewhere around China we can only say that Man is designed for cold weather and not warm.

Can you call the change from the ice age into the interglacial period climate change? Or a cyclic even that is PART of the climate.

Yeah, nightmare is full of crap when he says that science cannot measure mean global temperature (MGT) and he hasn't a clue about most matters scientific but he isn't speaking about science on this subject but philosophy. And in that he is as well prepared as anyone else.

Am being Into the Night

One way a climate might be referenced is by the flora and fauna. Arid regions are different than deserts just as rain forests are different as well.

Earth has many climates. I never claimed otherwise.

If you look up most dictionary definitions of 'climate', you will find something similar to 'weather over a long time'. Flora and fauna follows weather patterns, so yes, the two are linked. Flora and fauna don't define the climate though, weather does.

There is no global climate because there is no 'global' weather.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: Are you telling us....

litesong wrote:

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: Are you telling us....

AGW denier liar whiners tell us that volcanoes, world-wide, are increasing & causing the effects, that are "mistaken" to be AGW effects. If you weren't an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner, you & James would love each other.
However, James sees that "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
If you look up most dictionary definitions of 'climate', you will find something similar to 'weather over a long time'. Flora and fauna follows weather patterns, so yes, the two are linked. Flora and fauna don't define the climate though, weather does.

There is no global climate because there is no 'global' weather.

There is and isn't a global climate. It's not a paradox. Alan Bauldree of Homer, La. can explain this because he knows everything. He goes by AB Hammer. He will allow me to post online only if I have his permission.