|Oceans absorb almost a third of global CO2 emissions, but at what cost?19-03-2019 23:21|
|Tai Hai Chen★★★☆☆
|Into the Night★★★★★
|Argument from randU. Using made up numbers does not a convincing argument make.|
Into the Night wrote:
I bet the oceans absorb less when the CO2 is saturated.
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|15 ppm O3 capture 98% of UV so what makes IPCC think 15 ppm CO2 don't capture 98% of those 3 bands of||0||19-04-2019 16:27|
|Rising CO2 on declining nutrition in food is big issue, TED talk hears||0||19-04-2019 15:32|
|Going up against CO2 is going up against GOD.||0||19-04-2019 15:14|
|So let's say the US spends 100 trillion USD to build the factories and put 100 billion tons of CO2 in||0||19-04-2019 14:57|
|What makes IPCC thinks N2, O2, O3 are not as good at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can?||2||18-04-2019 20:57|