next step-human kulling

unitedearthchild wrote:...my calculations, if the world doesn't impose or rather enforce limitations on the population by demanding that couples or possibly people should have no more than one child, we're in for trouble....With the rise in temperature we can expect a number of new life threatening diseases .... the earth is fighting back and she is furious.

unitedearthchild wrote:
In accordance with what I've read on other platforms, the earth can sustain about 3 billion people without strain. What this means is that we've overpopulated the earth by 4.4 billion people(lets take into consideration that the census is never accurate). So by my calculations, if the world doesn't impose or rather enforce limitations on the population by demanding that couples or possibly people should have no more than one child, we're in for trouble. I believe that if we believe in evolution then is it not possible that the earth is evolving and making a statement in her own evolution that she simply cannot carry the load of human reproduction. Effectively the earth is warning us that she will warm up to the point that land mass will shrink with rising sea levels, deserts will grow and our food sources will diminish; thus resulting in war for food and sustainable land. With the rise in temperature we can expect a number of new life threatening diseases to increase because bacteria evolves faster than flora or fauna. Disease creates panic and panic creates irrational human behaviour. So ladies and gentleman, brace yourselves; the earth is fighting back and she is furious.

GasGuzzler wrote:.... would you change your mind about this if I said I agree with you? I do!

[b]Tim the plumber wrote:1, evil shit.
2, defeatest shit.

unitedearthchild wrote:
To those who think that I meant that human kulling is a solution, you're wrong. I don't mean that we should kill people for the sake of survival. What I do mean is that human kulling will be practiced at some time in our near future and most people will be oblivious to the human kulling when(not if) it happens. The W.H.O(World Health Organisation) doesn't simply keep or research diseases, they hand it over to other research facilities for "development". This is where biological warfare comes into play. Think about it this way, the social and economic pressure on countries that have a high population force people in those countries to relocate to countries with a more sound economy. This leads to influx control becoming almost obsolete thus causing strain on a once sound economy. Therefore this will lead to the same economically sound country calling for a limited population act or populace law to be imposed. Countries don't take kindly to dictatorship from other countries and where do you think that leads to? The answer is, it leads to war. Currently, America, China and India are being listed as the top 3 greenhouse emission contributors. The one thing that these 3 countries have in common is that they have high populations. This being said, when the world realises that global warming is not ONLY coming from carbon emissions but from the lack of population control, the next step will be damage control. That's when governments around the world will engage in biological warfare and people will not even realise that the human kulling has begun. After all, weren't the native American people almost brought to extinction through small pox donated to them on blankets. So to the Indians (in India) and Chinese, I say, be careful when the missionaries come to you and say "we come, bearing gifts". To the Americans, I say, brace yourselves for the scores and droves who shall come seeking the American dream. To the world, I say, the next dose of ebola, swine flu, avian flu bubonic plague or fatal malaria will shamefully be sponsored by overpopulation(and your world leaders).

Commonsense wrote:
USA there whole purpose is to Kill about 4 TRILLION PEOPLE .