|New way to tackle Climate Change11-05-2016 11:08|
|Hey People, Could you do me a favour and take a look at this very quickly? It's an entry I made to a competition, fresh look at climate change, and it will only take a minute of your time and if you think it's worthwhile then Please vote. It's going to take more than cutting emissions to tackle climate change. Thanks!|
Edited on 11-05-2016 11:14
Dos Ramos wrote:Hey People, Could you do me a favour and take a look at this very quickly?
I actually looked at it quite slowly. Is that OK?
Dos Ramos wrote: It's going to take more than cutting emissions to tackle climate change.
I need a little help from you first. I need a few answers to a few basic, straightforward questions:
1) What is "climate"?
2) How do we measure "climate" and what are the units of measure?
3) How do we know when this "climate" thing changes?
4) How do "emissions" relate to changes in "climate" measurements?
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|Into the Night★★★★★
Dos Ramos wrote:
An novel concept. Just how many probes would feel you need to keep the entire Arctic frozen?
How many watts would that require? (You can use horsepower if you wish)
The Parrot Killer