Remember me
▼ Content

New way to tackle Climate Change


New way to tackle Climate Change11-05-2016 11:08
Dos Ramos
☆☆☆☆☆
(1)
Hey People, Could you do me a favour and take a look at this very quickly? It's an entry I made to a competition, fresh look at climate change, and it will only take a minute of your time and if you think it's worthwhile then Please vote. It's going to take more than cutting emissions to tackle climate change. Thanks!

yhttps://www.vmbvoom.com/pitches/the-big-freeze
Attached image:


Edited on 11-05-2016 11:14
11-05-2016 15:50
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14389)
Dos Ramos wrote:Hey People, Could you do me a favour and take a look at this very quickly?

I actually looked at it quite slowly. Is that OK?

Dos Ramos wrote: It's going to take more than cutting emissions to tackle climate change.


I need a little help from you first. I need a few answers to a few basic, straightforward questions:

1) What is "climate"?
2) How do we measure "climate" and what are the units of measure?
3) How do we know when this "climate" thing changes?
4) How do "emissions" relate to changes in "climate" measurements?

Thanks.


.


I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit

A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
12-05-2016 00:33
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21582)
Dos Ramos wrote:
Hey People, Could you do me a favour and take a look at this very quickly? It's an entry I made to a competition, fresh look at climate change, and it will only take a minute of your time and if you think it's worthwhile then Please vote. It's going to take more than cutting emissions to tackle climate change. Thanks!

[/url]https://www.vmbvoom.com/pitches/the-big-freeze


An novel concept. Just how many probes would feel you need to keep the entire Arctic frozen?

How many watts would that require? (You can use horsepower if you wish)


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan




Join the debate New way to tackle Climate Change:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
'Leaders have a responsibility to tackle climate change,' McKenna says day after Kenney victory028-04-2019 21:17
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact