New Posters beware!

Ceist wrote:
New posters beware!

This forum is almost completely neglected by it's owner and is virtually unmoderated, so it has become the last refuge of a small handful of hardcore science deniers and conspiracy theorists who exhibit strong signs of mental illness - including personality disorders, autism spectrum disorders, narcissistic irrational and delusional thinking, emotional dis-regulation, paranoia, pathological lying, and abusive sociopathic manipulative behavior.

They have probably been banned from other forums for their poor behavior just as much as for their trolling of utterly irrational scientifically illiterate crackpot ideas.

Post at your own risk.

Ceist wrote:
New posters beware!

This forum is almost completely neglected by it's owner and is virtually unmoderated, so it has become the last refuge of a small handful of hardcore science deniers and conspiracy theorists who exhibit strong signs of mental illness - including personality disorders, autism spectrum disorders, narcissistic irrational and delusional thinking, emotional dis-regulation, paranoia, pathological lying, and abusive sociopathic manipulative behavior.

They have probably been banned from other forums for their poor behavior just as much as for their trolling of utterly irrational scientifically illiterate crackpot ideas.

Post at your own risk.

Hank wrote:Can you point me to a site where there is rational discussions of climate change? I'm interested in learning more about the science.

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:Can you point me to a site where there is rational discussions of climate change? I'm interested in learning more about the science.

You are interested in pursuing your WACKY religious faith which you confusingly call "The Science" (no relation to actual science).

You have shown here in this forum that you want nothing to do with discussing actual science, that you FEAR different perspectives and that you are too much of an intellectual coward to hold an honest discussion.

I wish you luck finding a forum that fits your niche.


.

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?/

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?/

What? Not even a "thank you"? I support your right to believe whatever WACKY religion you wish, no matter how stupidly illogical and contradictory to physics.

What a rude, thankless and scientifically illiterate prikk you are.

Have a great Stefan-Boltzmann day.


.

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?

You desperately try to make it my business, for some unknown reason, by plastering it all over a public forum like it's a billboard.


.

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do? .

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do? .

I see you are asking again? Are you looking for a different answer?

Let's discuss what you want. You seek a forum of mutually supportive gibber-babblers who support each other in role-playing pretend "smart people."

Of course you NEED for this activity to operate under the overarching theme of "Climate worship" to make you feel good in that respect as well.

What you DON'T want is the cold, harsh reality of actual science as discussed by actual smart people because you have no hope of appearing smart yourself and, more importantly, you won't be able to get your religious "high."

This forum, as you have already noticed, is not for you. I don't have any suggestions for you because you want a very ecclectic forum. Where are you going to find a forum with moderators who keep out actual science, e.g. Stefan-Boltzmann? ...or who keep out smart people?


I wish you luck in finding what you seek.


.

Hank wrote:You're too stupid to realize you don't even know that you've never answered the question. What business is it of yours what I want to do?

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:You're too stupid to realize you don't even know that you've never answered the question. What business is it of yours what I want to do?

So you want to discuss the disadvantages of being gullible.

For one thing, others will abuse your trust. Your church did that to you. In fact your emanating scientific illiteracy serves as a homing beacon for warmizombies and climate lemmings everywhere who want to use you for some political purpose.

Additionally, you will treat those who are mistaken as though they are correct and will consider even the WACKIEST of religious dogmas to be "settled science."

Also, you have no way of discerning the friendly, charismatic person from he whose argument stands on his own. When an idea appeals to you because the messenger appeals to you, that feeling becomes your determinant of "truth." On the other hand, the person you don't like but who affords you a compelling argument does not give you that same feeling and thus you reject it, i.e. good-bye Stefan-Boltzmann!

Best of luck with that.



.

Hank wrote:You may well be the dumbest person I've ever encountered. You still don't even realize that you have never answered the question. What business is it of yours what I want to do?

branner wrote:
Please note that personal attacks are not welcome on Climate-Debate.com. I know that the forum has not been moderated so much lately, but users have been banned before, and that could easily happen again.

Therefore: Stop talking about mental illnesses or calling each other names. Surface Detail had a good advice, which I would like to copy: "Stay calm, ignore the abuse, and stick to the science."

Please send me a Private Message if something needs my immediate attention.

And to the new users: Welcome to Climate-Debate.com. I'm fully aware that this can be a tough place, but I hope you will help pushing it in a good direction. I still hope to get more time to moderate soon.

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:You may well be the dumbest person I've ever encountered. You still don't even realize that you have never answered the question. What business is it of yours what I want to do?

So you're wondering where you should look first.to find the kind of "climate idiot's playgound" you seek that doesn't allow any adult supervision to ruin the children's "pirate's fort" fantasy.

Frankly I don't think you're going to readily find one. Your religion is in its death throes and attention-seeking hucksters like DRTKS are finding it harder and harder to find gullibles like yourself that need to be manipulated into buying what they're selling.

Maybe your best bet would be to start your own forum "The Science-Free Zone" in which you could ban people for alluding to Stefan-Boltzmann.

Otherwise you could look up trafn's work on this site and take a similar meltdown approach.

Yeah, you've got a tough one there. I wish you the best.


.

Hank wrote:So you really are the dumbest person I've ever met. And you keep proving it every time you post to my cut and paste. LOL What business is it of yours what I want to do?

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:So you really are the dumbest person I've ever met. And you keep proving it every time you post to my cut and paste. LOL What business is it of yours what I want to do?

I see you really want to learn about how warmizombies are so easily manipulated, how easily it is to just string them along for amusement or for political purposes.

I think you hit the nail on the head. They can be molded like Play-Doh. They WANT others molding their thinking for them so they don't have to do any of the hard mental labor themselves.

They can be formed into virtually anything, into believing any WACKY violation of physics. As you have discovered from your own manipulation, your ability to think for yourself atrophies and whenever you realize your deeply embedded dogma is embarrassingly wrong, all you can do is become frustrated and angry, but you always allow the stringing-along and the entertaining to continue.


.

Hank wrote:LOL What business is it of yours what I want to do?

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:LOL What business is it of yours what I want to do?

You still haven't figured it out?

Hank wrote:LOL What business is it of yours what I want to do?

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:LOL What business is it of yours what I want to do?

So you're still working on it.


.

Hank wrote:I'm starting to wonder about your obsession with me. It seems a little unnatural.

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?

Hank wrote:I'm starting to wonder about your obsession with me. It seems a little unnatural.

IBdaMann wrote:
The stupidest of posters resort to this very assertion. That means you are by no means the first. I can hook you up with some of the others.

Surface Detail wrote:
Why are you even having this stupid argument? IBdaMann is a wind-up merchant. That's what he does and that's what he loves. You obviously know your science, Hank, so stick to that. Let the lurkers decide what makes sense.

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?

Hank wrote: I can see that it's basically just a few guys that barely understand any science and just need to prop themselves up with each other's posts. .

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote:What business is it of yours what I want to do?

You don't consider your pointless fixation a bit wierd? I do, but I'm having fun with it.


.

Hank wrote: I'm out of here before you take it any further.

IBdaMann wrote:

Hank wrote: I can see that it's basically just a few guys that barely understand any science and just need to prop themselves up with each other's posts. .

This level of scientific illiteracy-induced denial is worth the price of admission.


.

spot wrote:Considering you could amuse yourself by reading textbooks or anything about planetary atmospheres published in the last 150+ years, why here?

spot wrote:If only you could go back in time and tell Tyndall about Stefan-Boltzmann

Hank wrote:
[Anyway I'm not arguing with IBdaMann, I'm just pasting the same thing over and over to see how many times he is going to fall for it. It not costing me any time.

Please note that personal attacks are not welcome on Climate-Debate.com. I know that the forum has not been moderated so much lately, but users have been banned before, and that could easily happen again.