Remember me
▼ Content

"It's the sun!" was refuted more than 20 years ago


"It's the sun!" was refuted more than 20 years ago15-02-2011 04:05
DesertphileProfile picture☆☆☆☆☆
(33)


Solar irradiance data:
yhttp://www.mps.mpg.de/projects/sun-climate/data/tsi_1611.txt

ftp://ftp.pmodwrc.ch/pub/data/irradiance/composite/DataPlots/composite_d41_62_1009.dat

Global temperature data:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
RE: Solar influence15-02-2011 18:31
Hayduke
☆☆☆☆☆
(21)
There is much more to the sun's effect on Earth climate than irradiance. This is merely a straw dog to draw attention away from the real influence of cosmic cycles. See the work of Akasofu, for example.
15-02-2011 21:08
DesertphileProfile picture☆☆☆☆☆
(33)
Hayduke wrote: There is much more to the sun's effect on Earth climate than irradiance. This is merely a straw dog to draw attention away from the real influence of cosmic cycles. See the work of Akasofu, for example.


The hypothesis "it's cosmic rays" was refuted more than eight years ago. THE TROPOSPHERE IS HEATING WHILE THE STRATOSPHERE IS COOLING. Sheeesh. The atmosphere even heats more at night than it used to several decades ago. Only greenhouse gases explain these facts: cosmic rays do not.

A few peer-reviewed science papers published in refereed science journals that show cosmic rays did not and are not causing the current unprecedented rate of warming:

http://www.mps.mpg.de/dokumente/publikationen/solanki/r47.pdf

http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/Laut2003.pdf

No correlation between cosmic rays and Earth's temperature:

http://www.eiscat.rl.ac.uk/Members/mike/publications/pdfs/2001/196_Lockwood_2000JA000115.pdf



http://ulysses.sr.unh.edu/NeutronMonitor/Misc/neutron2.html

In fact, periods of increased cosmic rays show no correlation with Earth warming:

http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri/lockwood2007.pdf

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/ray_surge.html

More papers that refuted the hypothesis:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0803.2298

http://atmos-chem-phys.net/8/7373/2008/acp-8-7373-2008.pdf

http://www.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/surf/publikationen/2010_calogovic.pdf

http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/1885/2010/acp-10-1885-2010.html

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0706/0706.4294v1.pdf

Go, and sin no more.
RE: Cosmic Rays15-02-2011 23:19
Hayduke
☆☆☆☆☆
(21)
Desertphile wrote:
[quote]Hayduke wrote: There is much more to the sun's effect on Earth climate than irradiance. This is merely a straw dog to draw attention away from the real influence of cosmic cycles. See the work of Akasofu, for example.


I said nothing about cosmic rays.
05-05-2014 11:23
Kano
☆☆☆☆☆
(23)
There is more to solar cycles than TSI YES.
There is UV which changes quite a bit up to 6%
The solar magnetic AP index
Solar wind.
CERN's experiments are proving cosmic rays do affect cloud formation.




Join the debate "It's the sun!" was refuted more than 20 years ago:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
The Sun II3906-10-2018 20:37
The Sun3006-10-2018 07:49
What would happen to global temperature if the US stopped all CO2 emissions for the next 50 years?1517-09-2018 09:12
After 100 years with ExxonMobil... 20 African countries no better off today1123-06-2018 20:08
WMO confirms 2017 among the three warmest years on record3325-05-2018 05:47
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact