I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted

I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted30-01-2017 22:17
Tai Hai Chen ★★★★☆ (1085)	I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough.
30-01-2017 22:22
Tim the plumber ★★★★☆ (1356)	Tai Hai Chen wrote: I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough. Why 440ppm??? The CO2 in the room you are in is loads more than that. This is a science area of debate. If you know nothing about science then you can't be in it.
31-01-2017 00:23
Tai Hai Chen ★★★★☆ (1085)	Tim the plumber wrote: Tai Hai Chen wrote: I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough. Why 440ppm??? The CO2 in the room you are in is loads more than that. This is a science area of debate. If you know nothing about science then you can't be in it. 440 because that's what it was tens of millions of years ago and which is known to be safe levels for all floral and fauna.
31-01-2017 01:05
Tim the plumber ★★★★☆ (1356)	Tai Hai Chen wrote: Tim the plumber wrote: Tai Hai Chen wrote: I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough. Why 440ppm??? The CO2 in the room you are in is loads more than that. This is a science area of debate. If you know nothing about science then you can't be in it. 440 because that's what it was tens of millions of years ago and which is known to be safe levels for all floral and fauna. It is known to be safe for al lflora and fauna at far higher levels than that. Flora loves the stuff. Commercial greenhouses are kept at high levels of it, sometimes at such levels that it is deadly for humans.
31-01-2017 01:11
litesong ★★★★★ (2297)	Its important that "sigh-ants" be delineated by...... old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy steenkin' AGW denier liar whiners without science chemistry astronomy physics algebra & pre-calc in unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. Edited on 31-01-2017 01:13

Join the debate I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted:

Threads	Replies	Last post
Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium..	392	01-12-2023 21:58
Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat	326	07-11-2023 19:16
Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and other tech firms agree to AI safeguards set by the White House	0	21-07-2023 19:45
The Best Public Way To End The COVID Pandemic Is Using Climate Change Reason	6	25-04-2023 19:50
There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N2	533	30-01-2023 07:22