Global Warming for Dummies

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Surface Detail wrote crap about lies and what he doesn't correctly understand.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day.....

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) AGW denier liar whiner gazzed & guzzling" guffed: Ever see an oil rig in a National park?

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Wake wrote;
They have to pay taxes that aren't covered in that listing on ALL of those EXPENSES.

I will only take issue with this statement. The oil company may write the check, but they don't pay for it. We do.

But your point of 6 times more profit is well taken.

Well, isn't that the case with ALL business?

Absolutely. The libs claim to be on the side of the poor man, raise the gas taxes, and hurt him even more....and then cry that the wealthy have too much, the middle class is disappearing, and we need to take more from the wealthy in the name of fairness....and the oil companies are the greedy bastards.

Thank you for the new signature line by the way

You're welcome for the signature phrase.

We have to STOP calling them liberals. They are nothing more than Marxists who hate everything and everyone that is successful because as dopers they couldn't successfully grow pot without burning their rental units to the ground.

Agree, but most libs don't know what a Marxist is, therefore when you call them out they are the same clueless glass eyed morons that don't understand their own party platform roots.

I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

I'm not kidding anyone. It's a simple fact you bloody idiot. The US Dollar was worth more against other currencies at the end of Obama's tenure than at the beginning of his tenure. Therefore Obama did not devalue the US Dollar. Jeez, just how stupid do you have to be to fail to grasp such a simple concept?

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:


I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

The Federal Reserve did that. The Fed has been doing it for quite a few decades now. Obama just directed the Fed to increase what it already was doing.

The Fed is price controls on money. Price controls never work.

Inflation IS a devaluation of the dollar. That is the definition of inflation, stupid.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

I'm not kidding anyone. It's a simple fact you bloody idiot. The US Dollar was worth more against other currencies at the end of Obama's tenure than at the beginning of his tenure. Therefore Obama did not devalue the US Dollar. Jeez, just how stupid do you have to be to fail to grasp such a simple concept?

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

I'm not kidding anyone. It's a simple fact you bloody idiot. The US Dollar was worth more against other currencies at the end of Obama's tenure than at the beginning of his tenure. Therefore Obama did not devalue the US Dollar. Jeez, just how stupid do you have to be to fail to grasp such a simple concept?

What is plain is that you don't do any buying. What - does your boyfriend do all of the housework? A medium cheap cut of meat for $11 lb, CANNED tomatoes at 2/$5? Bread at $4-9 a loaf depending on just how healthy it is for you? A pair of Florsheim dress shoes for $200? A real suit from Brooks Bros. off of a Nordstrom rack at $400? Men's socks at $12/pr? Underwear $30 for a pack of 4 at some dump.

Before Obama you could get any of these things for at least half the price. Some of these things at 1/4th the price. I have some unopened packs of clothing on the shelf with these prices on them so don't deny the facts.

At this point rather than rise the national debt has dropped by 9 Billion dollars.

The Democrat party is dead. As the millennial generation ages they are not going to want to be taxed to death as the Democrats have a need to do. This has already shown up with Trump's election.

You losers are going to be thrown out with the garbage.

Surface Detail wrote:
Also, it's looking increasingly likely that it is Trump who is going to be thrown out with the garbage. Current betting odds indicate that there is a 56% chance that Trump won't survive a full first term:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:
Also, it's looking increasingly likely that it is Trump who is going to be thrown out with the garbage. Current betting odds indicate that there is a 56% chance that Trump won't survive a full first term:

Apparently you are too young to know that the media reported the same sort of thing about Ronald Reagan despite the fact that he won 44 states in his first election and 48 in his second.

So you just go right ahead believing those "government agencies" whom you don't know but are being reported by the media.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:
Also, it's looking increasingly likely that it is Trump who is going to be thrown out with the garbage. Current betting odds indicate that there is a 56% chance that Trump won't survive a full first term:

Apparently you are too young to know that the media reported the same sort of thing about Ronald Reagan despite the fact that he won 44 states in his first election and 48 in his second.

So you just go right ahead believing those "government agencies" whom you don't know but are being reported by the media.

You misunderstand, Wake. The graphs are based on the actual odds offered by betting companies. They mean that you can currently make more money from a bet that Trump does complete his term than from a bet that he doesn't complete his term. I'm doing you a favour here - this is surely a golden opportunity for a Trump believer such as yourself to make a few dollars! Why not put your money where your mouth is?

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

I'm not kidding anyone. It's a simple fact you bloody idiot. The US Dollar was worth more against other currencies at the end of Obama's tenure than at the beginning of his tenure. Therefore Obama did not devalue the US Dollar. Jeez, just how stupid do you have to be to fail to grasp such a simple concept?

What is plain is that you don't do any buying. What - does your boyfriend do all of the housework? A medium cheap cut of meat for $11 lb, CANNED tomatoes at 2/$5? Bread at $4-9 a loaf depending on just how healthy it is for you? A pair of Florsheim dress shoes for $200? A real suit from Brooks Bros. off of a Nordstrom rack at $400? Men's socks at $12/pr? Underwear $30 for a pack of 4 at some dump.

Before Obama you could get any of these things for at least half the price. Some of these things at 1/4th the price. I have some unopened packs of clothing on the shelf with these prices on them so don't deny the facts.

At this point rather than rise the national debt has dropped by 9 Billion dollars.

The Democrat party is dead. As the millennial generation ages they are not going to want to be taxed to death as the Democrats have a need to do. This has already shown up with Trump's election.

You losers are going to be thrown out with the garbage.

You'll forgive me if I choose to rely on the official government statistics for the US rate of inflation, rather than unrepresentative anecdotes from an anonymous, habitual liar with an abusive nature and an unreliable memory.

Surface Detail wrote:
Also, it's looking increasingly likely that it is Trump who is going to be thrown out with the garbage. Current betting odds indicate that there is a 56% chance that Trump won't survive a full first term:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

I'm not kidding anyone. It's a simple fact you bloody idiot. The US Dollar was worth more against other currencies at the end of Obama's tenure than at the beginning of his tenure. Therefore Obama did not devalue the US Dollar. Jeez, just how stupid do you have to be to fail to grasp such a simple concept?

What is plain is that you don't do any buying. What - does your boyfriend do all of the housework? A medium cheap cut of meat for $11 lb, CANNED tomatoes at 2/$5? Bread at $4-9 a loaf depending on just how healthy it is for you? A pair of Florsheim dress shoes for $200? A real suit from Brooks Bros. off of a Nordstrom rack at $400? Men's socks at $12/pr? Underwear $30 for a pack of 4 at some dump.

Before Obama you could get any of these things for at least half the price. Some of these things at 1/4th the price. I have some unopened packs of clothing on the shelf with these prices on them so don't deny the facts.

At this point rather than rise the national debt has dropped by 9 Billion dollars.

The Democrat party is dead. As the millennial generation ages they are not going to want to be taxed to death as the Democrats have a need to do. This has already shown up with Trump's election.

You losers are going to be thrown out with the garbage.

You'll forgive me if I choose to rely on the official government statistics for the US rate of inflation, rather than unrepresentative anecdotes from an anonymous, habitual liar with an abusive nature and an unreliable memory.

So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Wake wrote:

Apparently you are too young to know that the media reported the same sort of thing about Ronald Reagan despite the fact that he won 44 states in his first election and 48 in his second.

So you just go right ahead believing those "government agencies" whom you don't know but are being reported by the media.

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:
Also, it's looking increasingly likely that it is Trump who is going to be thrown out with the garbage. Current betting odds indicate that there is a 56% chance that Trump won't survive a full first term:

Current odds??? You have no idea how to calculate odds!

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
I think that they do know more or less about the party platform. They are just too stupid to realize that it isn't the smart and powerful they would destroy but themselves.

Look at what Obama did to the very people that voted for him. The rich and powerful made more money than ever while the inflation and devaluation of the American dollar made the savings and welfare of the little guy worthless.

All socialisms are this way. Stalin didn't remove the rich from power - he murdered millions of little guys who wouldn't turn their life savings over to him.

greenman has marked himself as more of a fool by what he writes than the fact that he's a druggy. Imagine aiming a gun at your own head and threatening others that you will pull the trigger?

Why do you lie about things that can easily be looked up? This article, for example, isn't particularly flattering about Obama, but as it points out:

"Inflation and interest rates: Here the Obama record is enviable. The annual average inflation rate of 1.6 percent during his tenure is the lowest of any recent presidential term. The taming of inflation and inflationary expectations has translated into historically low interest rates. During Obama's time in office, the rates on new mortgages have averaged 4.21 percent compared to more than 7 percent as recently as 2001."

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously about anything when you lie about things that can easily be shown to be false?

Go right ahead and believe that since you know so much about it. Obama simply ramped up the printing presses and printed as much money as he needed. This is against the law but the media was entirely for it.

The US Dollar was devalued because of this not ONCE but twice and in the entire US history the US Dollar has never been devalued. Along with this devaluation came what you call "low inflation" because you have as much knowledge about economics as you have about science.

I don't need to talk to a moron who couldn't tell the night from the day and is willing to let the media lead him around by the nose. Just try doing the shopping for your mother who you no doubt live with.

Your claim that Obama devalued the US Dollar is simply a lie.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of quantitative easing (which, incidentally, was initiated in the US in November 2008 under GW Bush), the figures just don't support your assertion. The average rate of inflation in the US during Obama's tenure was an unusually low 1.6%, and the US Dollar also appreciated against other currencies. For example, at the start of Obama's tenure on January 20, 2009, $1.00 bought bought just €0.77; at end of his tenure on January 20, 2017, $1.00 bought €0.94.

These are not opinions, that are straight, undisputed facts. By any reasonable definition of the word, Obama clearly did not devalue the US Dollar!

Exactly who do you think you're kidding.

I'm not kidding anyone. It's a simple fact you bloody idiot. The US Dollar was worth more against other currencies at the end of Obama's tenure than at the beginning of his tenure. Therefore Obama did not devalue the US Dollar. Jeez, just how stupid do you have to be to fail to grasp such a simple concept?

What is plain is that you don't do any buying. What - does your boyfriend do all of the housework? A medium cheap cut of meat for $11 lb, CANNED tomatoes at 2/$5? Bread at $4-9 a loaf depending on just how healthy it is for you? A pair of Florsheim dress shoes for $200? A real suit from Brooks Bros. off of a Nordstrom rack at $400? Men's socks at $12/pr? Underwear $30 for a pack of 4 at some dump.

Before Obama you could get any of these things for at least half the price. Some of these things at 1/4th the price. I have some unopened packs of clothing on the shelf with these prices on them so don't deny the facts.

At this point rather than rise the national debt has dropped by 9 Billion dollars.

The Democrat party is dead. As the millennial generation ages they are not going to want to be taxed to death as the Democrats have a need to do. This has already shown up with Trump's election.

You losers are going to be thrown out with the garbage.

You'll forgive me if I choose to rely on the official government statistics for the US rate of inflation, rather than unrepresentative anecdotes from an anonymous, habitual liar with an abusive nature and an unreliable memory.

So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Those "few others" have thus far included every national and international scientific organization in the world

Surface Detail wrote:
(including, of course, NASA) as well as many scientific publishing companies.

Surface Detail wrote:
You've now added the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which issues inflation data) to that list,

Surface Detail wrote:
though you haven't actually explained why you believe they're lying about inflation statistics.

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Those "few others" have thus far included every national and international scientific organization in the world (including, of course, NASA) as well as many scientific publishing companies.

You've now added the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which issues inflation data) to that list, though you haven't actually explained why you believe they're lying about inflation statistics.

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Those "few others" have thus far included every national and international scientific organization in the world

Consensus is not used in science. Blanket statements like this are just false authority fallacy.

Surface Detail wrote:
(including, of course, NASA) as well as many scientific publishing companies.

NASA is a government agency. Most of it works fine. A few in NASA don't. They are the ones putting out the stupid shit that doesn't even comply with known physical laws.

Surface Detail wrote:
You've now added the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which issues inflation data) to that list,

Their method of calculating inflation is flawed.

Surface Detail wrote:
though you haven't actually explained why you believe they're lying about inflation statistics.

Yes I have. They are comparing against other currencies in the world. ALL nations print money. NONE of it being compared to commodity prices through this office.

As to why they do it, it was directed to do it by Obama, to make him look good despite the failing economy caused by his interference with it.


You have a very odd view of what 'paranoia' is.

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Those "few others" have thus far included every national and international scientific organization in the world (including, of course, NASA) as well as many scientific publishing companies.

You've now added the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which issues inflation data) to that list, though you haven't actually explained why you believe they're lying about inflation statistics.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435093/barack-obama-economy-jobs-ugly-truth

What ignorance like surface defect has is that he is perfectly willing to believe that inflation statistics without even knowing what it is.

Originally the method for measuring the inflation was simple. You did a study to discover what most people bought. They called it a "bag of groceries".

Then they would buy the same thing the next year and measure whether it had risen or fallen.

But the Government didn't like this because of the way federal reserve operates guarantees a certain inflation rate above the normal rate.

And what they discovered was that when products got too expensive people would substitute for less expensive items.

So our wonderful government decided to "capture" this reduction in the price of a "bag of groceries" by inserting the lesser value products that the public was forced to revert to because of the inflated value of the better products.

You see that you couldn't afford that "bag of groceries" because it had inflated out of sight so you choosing what you could afford was seized upon as a way to lie to the public with smiles on their faces.

When the price of gas got too high and people reverted to the cheap independent stations why gasoline actually showed a REDUCTION in price and not a rise.

When people stopped buying bread and reverted to making their own and so bought flour instead, BREAD had gotten cheaper!

And surface defect not having the slightest idea what is going on blindly accepts these numbers as having some sort of real meaning. What a son of a bitch. This is why people like him should have their faces shoved into the back of their skulls.

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Those "few others" have thus far included every national and international scientific organization in the world

Consensus is not used in science. Blanket statements like this are just false authority fallacy.

Surface Detail wrote:
(including, of course, NASA) as well as many scientific publishing companies.

NASA is a government agency. Most of it works fine. A few in NASA don't. They are the ones putting out the stupid shit that doesn't even comply with known physical laws.

Surface Detail wrote:
You've now added the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which issues inflation data) to that list,

Their method of calculating inflation is flawed.

Surface Detail wrote:
though you haven't actually explained why you believe they're lying about inflation statistics.

Yes I have. They are comparing against other currencies in the world. ALL nations print money. NONE of it being compared to commodity prices through this office.

As to why they do it, it was directed to do it by Obama, to make him look good despite the failing economy caused by his interference with it.


You have a very odd view of what 'paranoia' is.

You have a very odd understanding of how consumer price inflation is calculated. It has nothing to do with other currencies. It is determined by looking at the change in price of a representative sample of goods and services.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So you would rather rely on a government that is known to lie all the time, particularly by misusing statistics, to support their agenda, eh?

Your paranoia knows no bounds. It must suck to be you, believing that everyone is conspiring, lying and out to trick you. You poor soul.

They aren't. Just some idiots in government (and a few others).

There are more numbers than zero and hundred percent, you know.

Those "few others" have thus far included every national and international scientific organization in the world (including, of course, NASA) as well as many scientific publishing companies.

You've now added the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which issues inflation data) to that list, though you haven't actually explained why you believe they're lying about inflation statistics.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435093/barack-obama-economy-jobs-ugly-truth

What ignorance like surface defect has is that he is perfectly willing to believe that inflation statistics without even knowing what it is.

Originally the method for measuring the inflation was simple. You did a study to discover what most people bought. They called it a "bag of groceries".

Then they would buy the same thing the next year and measure whether it had risen or fallen.

But the Government didn't like this because of the way federal reserve operates guarantees a certain inflation rate above the normal rate.

And what they discovered was that when products got too expensive people would substitute for less expensive items.

So our wonderful government decided to "capture" this reduction in the price of a "bag of groceries" by inserting the lesser value products that the public was forced to revert to because of the inflated value of the better products.

You see that you couldn't afford that "bag of groceries" because it had inflated out of sight so you choosing what you could afford was seized upon as a way to lie to the public with smiles on their faces.

When the price of gas got too high and people reverted to the cheap independent stations why gasoline actually showed a REDUCTION in price and not a rise.

When people stopped buying bread and reverted to making their own and so bought flour instead, BREAD had gotten cheaper!

And surface defect not having the slightest idea what is going on blindly accepts these numbers as having some sort of real meaning. What a son of a bitch. This is why people like him should have their faces shoved into the back of their skulls.

Your pathetic internet hard-man act does nothing for your credibility.