Remember me
▼ Content

Global warming and the answer .


Global warming and the answer .22-10-2013 17:30
Huynh Phu Dat
☆☆☆☆☆
(7)
At many meeting about anti climate change problem , our governments signed many decree about decrease carbon dioxide value but are they correct ? We know :

The atmosphere of the earth = 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases .

The atmosphere of the earth = total atmosphere of all countries so each country have to create 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases base on the area of that country .

I call the tree/plant create O2 and decrease CO2 - value of O2 / CO2 base on the area of 1 country is A1 - original O2 /CO2 value of country A without the appearance of citizens of A .

When citizens of country A appear , they use O2 and create CO2 so country A have to create O2 value and decrease CO2 value for citizens of A , then citizens of A destroy tree / plant of country A ( build house , .... ) so country A have to restoring O2 value and decreasing CO2 value of tree / plant when they destroy tree / plant .

I call this is A2 value - O2 / CO2 value of country A must have for the appearance of citizens of country A .

So real O2 / CO2 value of country A or A0 = A1 + A2

Total A0 of all countries = ( total A1 + total A2 ) of all countries - KEY TO SOLVE CLIMATE CHANGE ( I only talk about O2 and CO2 only )

But all things our government signed about anti climate change is decrease CO2 , and all our scientists think about decreasing CO2 , right ?



If we talk about climate change , we talk about human kind create too much CO2 value , but all of us forget O2 value . When architectures destroy tree/plant and build many famous places such as White House , NATO headquater , WHO , United Nation , .... , our architectures didn't compare the value of O2/CO2 of tree / plant they destroy – A3 and O2/CO2 of tree / plant they re – create around the building after they build the building – A4 . When people work in that building , they use O2 and create CO2 – A5 so tree / plant of that area must :

A4 must = A3 + A5 .

But our architectures always create A4 < A3 – because they choose the beauty of the building or the beautiful view of the building , not choose A3 value and forget A5 value ( no one teach this things at university ) .



I choose Parliament House of German is a example . Of course , when the German build this building , they destroy the wild tree/plant at the place they build Parliament House of German – or almost no O2/CO2 come from here , A4 of the building almost = 0 .

And in front of the building , when they destroy wild tree/plant with really high value of O2/ CO2 – contain high height grass , low height tree, middle height tree , high or very high tree – A3 , they choose the beautiful view of the building , the beauty of the building and use grass – which give us low value of O2/CO2 , if they plant tree on the grass , we can have more O2/CO2 .

Most of famous place we visit every year always choose low value of O2/CO2 plant such as flower and grass in climate change age .

Even at White House , I'm sure 100% when they choose grass in front of their building , of course

A4 < A3 + A5 .

In climate change , every city , town , ward , district ... must know the original value of O2/CO2 of wild tree/plant of the area of the city before they build the city , ..... , then is O2/CO2 of tree / plant which we re-create , and the value of O2/CO2 of all the people living or working in that place , area , ...

I want to talk about human design our cities , but I think this is enough .

Finally , in climate change age , all of famous places we will see here will choose the beauty of the building or the value of O2/CO2 ?

And here are images of some famous places I collect : ( I don't have enough knowledge to collect all the famous places in this world , and if I want to do it , I must have more than just 1 foreign language to use Google to search )

Another example White House , they plant a lot of trees around the building but in front of White House , they choose large area of grass , or choose the low value of O2 / CO2 , if they think about what trees they destroy when they build this building , they will choose grass + trees , not only grass area .

If the way we design our society is right , we will not have global warming .If at White House , they choose grass in front of the building , if this is 1 error when the value of O2 is created / CO2 is decreased < value of O2 is created / CO2 is decreased of the plant they destroy when they create this building so this is 1 error .

We have 7 000 000 000 people in this world , it's meant we can have about 500 000 000 errors of design of the houses , many errors of the buildings of the government , errors of the roads about O2 / CO2 problem around this world and we are destroying the forrest , ...... Oh man , decreasing CO2 will help us anti global warming .Who is the guy gave people this idea ? I think he's just kidding with our home , this Earth .

For more info , please go to :

http://globalwarmingandtheanswer.blogspot.com/

( I have more than 20 images , too long to post here .... )
Join the debate Global warming and the answer .:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
IPCC sucks. They have no answer for natural climatic cooling other than painting houses black to decrease019-04-2019 16:32
Is it climate change or global warming? How science and a secret memo shaped the answer103-03-2019 22:20
Coal is the Answer812-11-2016 01:21
Are "popcorn" black holes the answer to linear entropy and, maybe, M2C2?412-10-2015 23:06
Is involuntary population control the answer to man-made climate change?511-10-2015 23:33
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact