Remember me
▼ Content

Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice



Page 8 of 8<<<678
11-01-2018 00:18
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
Arctic sea ice VOLUME for January 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~ 23,300 cubic kilometers. Present January 1, 2018 sea ice VOLUME is ~ 14,300 cubic kilometers, ~ 9000 cubic kilometers LESS than the 1980-89 average for January 1.
Edited on 11-01-2018 00:19
13-01-2018 01:16
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote: An anomalous High Arctic cold front strand runs near the North Pole. Two warm fronts are also in the High Arctic.
In short order, the cold front strand moved (sideways?) over the North Pole. The High Arctic warm fronts from North Bering Sea & north of mid-Siberia already are narrowing the strand, but the Present High Arctic Berserker)(2) or FAB
(2) still remains at 2.5 degC over average. Expectation is FAB
(2) will now warm.
& yes, FAB
(2) has now warmed to 5degC over average temperature.
With such expectations, the FAB
(2) actually did rise. But now, with warmth in the lower latitudes of the High Arctic, a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
13-01-2018 23:38
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
litesong wrote: With such expectations, the FAB
(2) actually did rise. But now, with warmth in the lower latitudes of the High Arctic, a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Over the past 75 days or so, various influences have caused the High Arctic over nearly 4 million square kilometers to fluctuate between averages of 2degC to 10degC OVER average. As can be seen, tho several cooling processes have been at work, no day or even a set of hours have averaged any temperatures UNDER the average temperatures of the High Arctic. The HAB
(2) has been in continual existence for ~ 145 days, such that no other HABB( could have existed for those days. The HAB
(2) now is only ~ 90 days or less from the record set by HAB
(1), of ~ 232 days.
14-01-2018 18:03
Wake
★★★★★
(2942)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote: With such expectations, the FAB
(2) actually did rise. But now, with warmth in the lower latitudes of the High Arctic, a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Over the past 75 days or so, various influences have caused the High Arctic over nearly 4 million square kilometers to fluctuate between averages of 2degC to 10degC OVER average. As can be seen, tho several cooling processes have been at work, no day or even a set of hours have averaged any temperatures UNDER the average temperatures of the High Arctic. The HAB
(2) has been in continual existence for ~ 145 days, such that no other HABB( could have existed for those days. The HAB
(2) now is only ~ 90 days or less from the record set by HAB
(1), of ~ 232 days.


Everyone got this now - to litebrain 75 days equals climate change.
14-01-2018 22:30
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: - to litebrain 75 days equals climate change.
Of course, "many time(plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" doesn't mention the continuous ~ 232 days of over-temperature that was HAB
(1) or the present ~ continuous 145 days that was HAB
(2) or the 11+ year low of solar TSI or the 3+ year solar TSI setting a 100 year record low. Most of all, "many time(plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" is proud of its many time (plus 1) threats which have caused several AGW advocates to leave this webcyst(correct spelling), but nev'r mentions that aspect of its personality 'cause it is jes too darn modest.
14-01-2018 23:41
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(832)
Litebeer,

Please define average.
15-01-2018 00:33
Wake
★★★★★
(2942)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Litebeer,

Please define average.


75 days or less than one hot summer defines climate change to him. Then he tries to copy something from some other source that uses non-ASCII characters and thinks that that somehow proves something.

When your IQ is defined by extended character sets that you don't know how to print you can pretty much see of what worth his analysis of anything is.
15-01-2018 01:45
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling"gushed:...define average.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" never got average (or any) grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in its average (or not) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. HOWEVER, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" worked more than average to earn its name.
15-01-2018 01:53
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(832)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling"gushed:...define average.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" never got average (or any) grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in its average (or not) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. HOWEVER, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" worked more than average to earn its name.


Soooo, that's a "no"?
15-01-2018 03:09
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: somehow proves something.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" ain't got no smarts ta know dat a 50 year languid & decreasing solar TSI can't lead to increasing Earth bio-sphere temperatures.... but dat is whot happnin'.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" continues to prove its name.
Edited on 15-01-2018 03:17
15-01-2018 03:27
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(832)
Soooo, you can't even explain your definition of average? Guess your diploma ain't worth a squirt of piss.
15-01-2018 03:37
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
GasGuzzler wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling"gushed:...define average.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" never got average (or any) grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in its average (or not) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. HOWEVER, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" worked more than average to earn its name.
that's a "no"?
"gazzzed & guzzzling" old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" agrees it got NO average grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in hi skule.
15-01-2018 03:39
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(832)
Yes, I agree. I got bad grades...but I can define average. Can you?
15-01-2018 04:07
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: I can define average.
I can define what is far less than average:
It is "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
////////
More accurately & inverted:
Above the average mean is:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
Edited on 15-01-2018 04:46
15-01-2018 05:15
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(832)
So you can't. Correct?
15-01-2018 07:55
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
[b]GasGuzzler wrote: Correct?
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" is seldom correct. That is correct.....no question mark!
I can define what is far less than average:
It is "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
////////
More accurately & inverted:
Above the average MEAN is:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
Edited on 15-01-2018 07:56
15-01-2018 08:10
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
15-01-2018 15:09
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(832)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.


...and what is the north pole average?
15-01-2018 15:58
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: what is the north pole average?
The North Pole averages as inhumanly cold (& MEAN) as "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
15-01-2018 22:57
Wake
★★★★★
(2942)
GasGuzzler wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.


...and what is the north pole average?


As you can see you can't put him on the spot because he hasn't a clue what he is saying even after he says it! This really is the definition of psychological damage.

I think that he is one of those children that was left home alone while the mother was out having fun and he hasn't a clue who his father is. A father figure is so underrated in today's society that it is a wonder that more of these female raised boys are killing everything in sight.
15-01-2018 23:09
litesong
★★★★★
(2150)
Wake wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:...and what is the north pole average?
..... female raised boys are killing everything in sight.
The North Pole averages as inhumanly cold (& MEAN) as "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" & "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up". Only old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners & many time (plus 1) threateners are apt perps to kill on this webcyst (spelled correctly).
Page 8 of 8<<<678





Join the debate Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Arctic waters not freezing73216-01-2018 02:21
Global warming and ice caps7214-01-2018 21:46
El Nino, La Nina Effects on Antarctic Ice Shelves312-01-2018 01:23
East Antarctic Ice Shelf Weaknesses16411-01-2018 17:40
Ever Wonder If The warming Arctic Ocean Is Causing This ?1608-01-2018 08:10
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Will Arctic summers be ice-free in this century?

Yes

No

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact