Remember me
▼ Content

Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice



Page 8 of 11<<<678910>>>
11-01-2018 00:18
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Arctic sea ice VOLUME for January 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~ 23,300 cubic kilometers. Present January 1, 2018 sea ice VOLUME is ~ 14,300 cubic kilometers, ~ 9000 cubic kilometers LESS than the 1980-89 average for January 1.
Edited on 11-01-2018 00:19
13-01-2018 01:16
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote: An anomalous High Arctic cold front strand runs near the North Pole. Two warm fronts are also in the High Arctic.
In short order, the cold front strand moved (sideways?) over the North Pole. The High Arctic warm fronts from North Bering Sea & north of mid-Siberia already are narrowing the strand, but the Present High Arctic Berserker)(2) or FAB
(2) still remains at 2.5 degC over average. Expectation is FAB
(2) will now warm.
& yes, FAB
(2) has now warmed to 5degC over average temperature.
With such expectations, the FAB
(2) actually did rise. But now, with warmth in the lower latitudes of the High Arctic, a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
13-01-2018 23:38
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote: With such expectations, the FAB
(2) actually did rise. But now, with warmth in the lower latitudes of the High Arctic, a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Over the past 75 days or so, various influences have caused the High Arctic over nearly 4 million square kilometers to fluctuate between averages of 2degC to 10degC OVER average. As can be seen, tho several cooling processes have been at work, no day or even a set of hours have averaged any temperatures UNDER the average temperatures of the High Arctic. The HAB
(2) has been in continual existence for ~ 145 days, such that no other HABB( could have existed for those days. The HAB
(2) now is only ~ 90 days or less from the record set by HAB
(1), of ~ 232 days.
14-01-2018 18:03
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote: With such expectations, the FAB
(2) actually did rise. But now, with warmth in the lower latitudes of the High Arctic, a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Over the past 75 days or so, various influences have caused the High Arctic over nearly 4 million square kilometers to fluctuate between averages of 2degC to 10degC OVER average. As can be seen, tho several cooling processes have been at work, no day or even a set of hours have averaged any temperatures UNDER the average temperatures of the High Arctic. The HAB
(2) has been in continual existence for ~ 145 days, such that no other HABB( could have existed for those days. The HAB
(2) now is only ~ 90 days or less from the record set by HAB
(1), of ~ 232 days.


Everyone got this now - to litebrain 75 days equals climate change.
14-01-2018 22:30
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: - to litebrain 75 days equals climate change.
Of course, "many time(plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" doesn't mention the continuous ~ 232 days of over-temperature that was HAB
(1) or the present ~ continuous 145 days that was HAB
(2) or the 11+ year low of solar TSI or the 3+ year solar TSI setting a 100 year record low. Most of all, "many time(plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" is proud of its many time (plus 1) threats which have caused several AGW advocates to leave this webcyst(correct spelling), but nev'r mentions that aspect of its personality 'cause it is jes too darn modest.
14-01-2018 23:41
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1026)
Litebeer,

Please define average.
15-01-2018 00:33
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Litebeer,

Please define average.


75 days or less than one hot summer defines climate change to him. Then he tries to copy something from some other source that uses non-ASCII characters and thinks that that somehow proves something.

When your IQ is defined by extended character sets that you don't know how to print you can pretty much see of what worth his analysis of anything is.
15-01-2018 01:45
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling"gushed:...define average.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" never got average (or any) grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in its average (or not) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. HOWEVER, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" worked more than average to earn its name.
15-01-2018 01:53
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1026)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling"gushed:...define average.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" never got average (or any) grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in its average (or not) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. HOWEVER, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" worked more than average to earn its name.


Soooo, that's a "no"?
15-01-2018 03:09
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: somehow proves something.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" ain't got no smarts ta know dat a 50 year languid & decreasing solar TSI can't lead to increasing Earth bio-sphere temperatures.... but dat is whot happnin'.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" continues to prove its name.
Edited on 15-01-2018 03:17
15-01-2018 03:27
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1026)
Soooo, you can't even explain your definition of average? Guess your diploma ain't worth a squirt of piss.
15-01-2018 03:37
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
GasGuzzler wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling"gushed:...define average.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" never got average (or any) grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in its average (or not) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. HOWEVER, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" worked more than average to earn its name.
that's a "no"?
"gazzzed & guzzzling" old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" agrees it got NO average grades in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in hi skule.
15-01-2018 03:39
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1026)
Yes, I agree. I got bad grades...but I can define average. Can you?
15-01-2018 04:07
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: I can define average.
I can define what is far less than average:
It is "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
////////
More accurately & inverted:
Above the average mean is:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
Edited on 15-01-2018 04:46
15-01-2018 05:15
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1026)
So you can't. Correct?
15-01-2018 07:55
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
[b]GasGuzzler wrote: Correct?
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" is seldom correct. That is correct.....no question mark!
I can define what is far less than average:
It is "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
////////
More accurately & inverted:
Above the average MEAN is:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
Edited on 15-01-2018 07:56
15-01-2018 08:10
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
15-01-2018 15:09
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1026)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.


...and what is the north pole average?
15-01-2018 15:58
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: what is the north pole average?
The North Pole averages as inhumanly cold (& MEAN) as "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling".
15-01-2018 22:57
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
GasGuzzler wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.


...and what is the north pole average?


As you can see you can't put him on the spot because he hasn't a clue what he is saying even after he says it! This really is the definition of psychological damage.

I think that he is one of those children that was left home alone while the mother was out having fun and he hasn't a clue who his father is. A father figure is so underrated in today's society that it is a wonder that more of these female raised boys are killing everything in sight.
15-01-2018 23:09
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Wake wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:...and what is the north pole average?
..... female raised boys are killing everything in sight.
The North Pole averages as inhumanly cold (& MEAN) as "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" & "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up". Only old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners & many time (plus 1) threateners are apt perps to kill on this webcyst (spelled correctly).
20-01-2018 17:40
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
20-01-2018 17:57
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
After "many time threatener(plus 1) wake-me-up" accused me of potential homocide, the following post will be my favorite for a bump, every time "many time threatener(plus 1) wake-me-up" has to post one of its many actions of criminal conduct:
litesong wrote:
Wake wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:...and what is the north pole average?
..... female raised boys are killing everything in sight.
The North Pole averages as inhumanly cold (& MEAN) as "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener(plus 1) gazzzed & guzzzling" & "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener(plus 1) wake-me-up". Only old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners & many time threateners(plus 1) are apt perps to kill on this webcyst (spelled correctly).
21-01-2018 03:19
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
21-01-2018 13:02
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.


So you're saying we'll be able to go sunbathing on Prince Edwards Island ? Many sailors have died there looking for the Northwest Passage.
BTW, the Gulf of Maine has been warming over the years. It's fed primarily by the Labrador Current.
https://www.pressherald.com/2015/10/25/climate-change-imperils-gulf-maine-people-plants-species-rely/
21-01-2018 18:30
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
So you're saying ....Prince Edwards Island .....the Gulf of Maine.....Labrador Current.
You can't put words in my mouth, which is an old sick silly sleepy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) AGW denier liar whiner tactic. My many posts about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1), FAB
(2), & decreasing Arctic Ice are about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1),FAB
(2) & decreasing Arctic Ice. If you want to highlite warming Prince Edwards Island, the Gulf of Maine & the Labrador Current, you should start a new thread.
Edited on 21-01-2018 18:32
21-01-2018 21:30
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
litesong wrote:
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
So you're saying ....Prince Edwards Island .....the Gulf of Maine.....Labrador Current.
You can't put words in my mouth, which is an old sick silly sleepy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) AGW denier liar whiner tactic. My many posts about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1), FAB
(2), & decreasing Arctic Ice are about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1),FAB
(2) & decreasing Arctic Ice. If you want to highlite warming Prince Edwards Island, the Gulf of Maine & the Labrador Current, you should start a new thread.


Then I guess you're not familiar with the currents in the Arctic Ocean. Sorry.
22-01-2018 00:14
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
So you're saying ....Prince Edwards Island .....the Gulf of Maine.....Labrador Current.
You can't put words in my mouth, which is an old sick silly sleepy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) AGW denier liar whiner tactic. My many posts about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1), FAB
(2), & decreasing Arctic Ice are about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1),FAB
(2) & decreasing Arctic Ice. If you want to highlite warming Prince Edwards Island, the Gulf of Maine & the Labrador Current, you should start a new thread.


Then I guess you're not familiar with the currents in the Arctic Ocean. Sorry.


Ouch. You're getting almost as sarcastic as me. Better be careful; as you get older it's more difficult to stop.

Whatever the source of your operation I certainly hope you are no longer in pain.
22-01-2018 00:28
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
So you're saying ....Prince Edwards Island .....the Gulf of Maine.....Labrador Current.
You can't put words in my mouth, which is an old sick silly sleepy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) AGW denier liar whiner tactic. My many posts about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1), FAB
(2), & decreasing Arctic Ice are about the North Pole, High Arctic, FAB
(1),FAB
(2) & decreasing Arctic Ice. If you want to highlite warming Prince Edwards Island, the Gulf of Maine & the Labrador Current, you should start a new thread.


Then I guess you're not familiar with the currents in the Arctic Ocean. Sorry.


Ouch. You're getting almost as sarcastic as me. Better be careful; as you get older it's more difficult to stop.

Whatever the source of your operation I certainly hope you are no longer in pain.


Wake,
I wasn't being sarcastic. If litesong were familiar with the the currents around the Artic then litesong would've known that I was showing examples associated with what litesong was talking about.
That is a nice try at deflection on your part.
@litesong, I think we need to cool the Arctic. If you look at the September pack ice, it isn't much. That's an eddy that warm water passes by. Apparently when there is no sun then the Arctic becomes cold enough to have more pack ice. And this year the amount of pack ice at the Atlantic entrance to the Arctic Ocean had a slight decrease. That suggests warming.

@Wake, how is that being sarcastic ? Is that all you know ? Just going after people ?
22-01-2018 01:03
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
[b]James_ wrote: I guess you're not familiar....
James guesses...as James always does.
22-01-2018 03:35
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
litesong wrote:
[b]James_ wrote: I guess you're not familiar....
James guesses...as James always does.


Je ne comprends quel tu parles. Parlez vous Anglais ?
What you're missing is that as glaciers in the Arctic melt the sea floor in the North Atlantic and in the Artic rises. Why the Arctic Ocean warms.
But as you say, I am only guessing about that.
Edited on 22-01-2018 03:42
22-01-2018 03:54
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
Now, FAB
(2) powers up again, to 10+degC over average. The long enduring cold front that has been on siberia & russia, that has intermittently intruded to hold High Arctic temperatures lower, now seems to be sagging to the south to countries south of russia.
Edited on 22-01-2018 04:17
22-01-2018 04:42
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]James_ wrote: I guess you're not familiar....
James guesses...as James always does.
What you're missing.... glaciers...... sea floor in the North Atlantic and in the Artic(sic) rises. Why the Arctic Ocean warms.
I am only guessing about that.
Yes, you guess to fit yer little bitty underwater volcano Earth bio-sphere warming scenerio. Other AGW denier liar whiners work the Antarctic the same way. Problem is all AGW denier liar whiners got to prove the underwater volcanoes are indeed putting more heat out than previous millenia, AND all over the world(think global). Of course, AGW denier liar whiners don't have the ability. They cry & whine on free, no work websites. & finally, AGW denier liar whiners have no answer to High Altitude atmosphere cooling with their little underwater (unseen & unresearched) volcanic, empty AGW denier liar whiner diversions.
Edited on 22-01-2018 04:51
22-01-2018 10:51
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
James_ wrote:Then I guess you're not familiar with the currents in the Arctic Ocean.
First, AGW denier liar whiners said it was the sun, altho the solar TSI has been languid for 50 years & low for 11+ years. Second, AGW denier liar whiners said it was X-ray sources from deep space to match AGW denier liar whiner deep shit they were pumping. Third, it was volcanoes. Fourth, AGW denier liar whiner James pushed the Atlantic Ridge volcanoes & now adds the Labrador Current in the mix. Fifth, a leaked report fr'm FOX NUUZ says, "tomorrow, a new science discovery will show data that dying people in wheelchairs from clandestine old folks homes have been dumped into the oceans for the last 100 years, saying that's why the oceans are warming..... & yeah.... rising too.
22-01-2018 11:21
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
litesong wrote:
James_ wrote:Then I guess you're not familiar with the currents in the Arctic Ocean.
First, AGW denier liar whiners said it was the sun, altho the solar TSI has been languid for 50 years & low for 11+ years. Second, AGW denier liar whiners said it was X-ray sources from deep space to match AGW denier liar whiner deep shit they were pumping. Third, it was volcanoes. Fourth, AGW denier liar whiner James pushed the Atlantic Ridge volcanoes & now adds the Labrador Current in the mix. Fifth, a leaked report fr'm FOX NUUZ says, "tomorrow, a new science discovery will show data that dying people in wheelchairs from clandestine old folks homes have been dumped into the oceans for the last 100 years, saying that's why the oceans are warming..... & yeah.... rising too.


Maybe you should become aware of some of the currents. The Greenland Sea feeds both the Labrador Current as well as the Gulf Stream. I think before you insult somebody you should get your facts straight.
Where the Gulf Stream goes north and south between Iceland and Greenland is a source of heat flowing from it's abyss. This is because glaciers are melting.
Attached image:


Edited on 22-01-2018 11:25
22-01-2018 15:27
Wake
★★★★★
(3396)
James_ wrote: @Wake, how is that being sarcastic ? Is that all you know ? Just going after people ?


litebrain is an idiot. Expecting him to understand anything at all is loony. Since you aren't loony I can only assume you were being sarcastic.
22-01-2018 19:24
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote: @Wake, how is that being sarcastic ? Is that all you know ? Just going after people ?


litebrain is an idiot. Expecting him to understand anything at all is loony. Since you aren't loony I can only assume you were being sarcastic.


I think you said it best when you said that if someone agrees with you then they know what they're talking about. :-)
22-01-2018 20:03
Into the Night
★★★★★
(5558)
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote: @Wake, how is that being sarcastic ? Is that all you know ? Just going after people ?


litebrain is an idiot. Expecting him to understand anything at all is loony. Since you aren't loony I can only assume you were being sarcastic.


I think you said it best when you said that if someone agrees with you then they know what they're talking about. :-)


Nice shot. You hit that one right in the bulls eye!


The Parrot Killer
22-01-2018 21:46
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
James_ wrote:
litesong wrote:
James_ wrote:Then I guess you're not familiar with the currents in the Arctic Ocean.
First, AGW denier liar whiners said it was the sun, altho the solar TSI has been languid for 50 years & low for 11+ years. Second, AGW denier liar whiners said it was X-ray sources from deep space to match AGW denier liar whiner deep shit they were pumping. Third, it was volcanoes. Fourth, AGW denier liar whiner James pushed the Atlantic Ridge volcanoes & now adds the Labrador Current in the mix. Fifth, a leaked report fr'm FOX NUUZ says, "tomorrow, a new science discovery will show data that dying people in wheelchairs from clandestine old folks homes have been dumped into the oceans for the last 100 years, saying that's why the oceans are warming..... & yeah.... rising too.


Maybe you should become aware of some of the currents. The Greenland Sea feeds both the Labrador Current as well as the Gulf Stream. I think before you insult somebody you should get your facts straight.
Where the Gulf Stream goes north and south between Iceland and Greenland is a source of heat flowing from it's abyss. This is because glaciers are melting.

I've been reporting High Arctic(you know where that is?) major continuous over-temperatures for years that have leaped from 30-40 days in length, to 100-140-160 to 231 continuous days in length. To sidetrack, you mention Maine's Gulf, Prince Edward Is., & the Labrador Current, trying to bolster your unsigh-an-tific, unresearched & feeble attempt to blame underwater volcanoes for global warming. & now, you're completely off-track, introducing the Greenland Current & the Gulf Stream. At least, you finally got to effective AGW generated extra heat in the Gulf Stream. But, initially blaming the Labrador Current for excess Greenland glacier melt without mentioning the Greenland Current, but mostly not mentioning the Gulf Stream giving up excess AGW generated heat to the Labrador Current is your own unsigh-an-tific block. As stated your little theory is unsigh-an-tific, unresearched & feeble.
May you swim in the Labrador Current BEFORE the Gulf Stream dumps heat into it.
23-01-2018 20:32
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:....a thin reach of cold sweeps over the North Pole, cooling FAB
(2) to 3degC over average temperature.
Tho cooling processes suppress Present High Arctic Berserker(2) or FAB
(2), it rises, now to 5degC over average & remains above the average for 145 continuous days.
FAB
(2) is past 150 days in length. After some fluctuations of late, High Arctic temperature rises to 6degC over-average. It appears at least, that short term temperature rises should continue.
As surmised, FAB
(2) powers up to 8degC over-average temperature, with 160 days of existence, seemingly in easy range.
Now, FAB
(2) powers up again, to 10+degC over average. The long enduring cold front that has been on siberia & russia, that has intermittently intruded to hold High Arctic temperatures lower, now seems to be sagging to the south to countries south of russia.
A vast weather system of similar temperature (~ -22degF to -4degF) atmosphere, spans from almost Lake Superior & St. Lawrence River, extends WNW, N, NE & E, including Canadian Archipelago, covering Greenland(tho the GIS high elevations drop to -40degC to -45degC), all Alaska & waters north of the state & eastern Siberia, then descends SW, including mid & western Siberia & most of Russia, & south to northern China, & countries south of Russia. Tho of similar temperature, southern regions under the vast body of air would be considered below normal temps & northern regions, above or well above normal temperatures. As such, FAB
(2) continues at 10+degC. above normal.
This does explain one of the reasons, the High Arctic is increasingly above normal temperatures & at times, southern regions are invaded by what is considered northern Arctic cold fronts.
Edited on 23-01-2018 21:18
Page 8 of 11<<<678910>>>





Join the debate Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Brief history of ice ages, and how that might relate to our future10405-09-2018 00:12
Antarctic ice melting faster than ever, studies show3218-06-2018 20:14
"Freakishly Warm" Arctic Weather Has Scientists Reconsidering Worst-Case Scenarios on Climate1104-06-2018 18:50
Jennifer Francis: Crazy Weather and the Arctic Meltdown1726-05-2018 23:39
"Why is America melting so fast?"822-05-2018 15:55
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact