Remember me
▼ Content

Climate change is simple: David Roberts


Climate change is simple: David Roberts15-11-2017 23:03
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(406)
David Roberts is staff writer at Grist.org. In "Climate Change is Simple" he describes the causes and effects of climate change in blunt, plain terms.

On April 16, 2012, speakers and attendees gathered at TEDxTheEvergreenStateCollege: Hello Climate Change to reflect on the ability -- and responsibility -- of formal and informal education to inspire and empower action in this era of climate change.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7ktYbVwr90
15-11-2017 23:13
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(406)
World on track for 3C of warming under current global climate pledges, warns UN
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/03/world-on-track-for-3c-of-warming-under-current-global-climate-pledges-warns-un

Current climate commitments are insufficient to reduce emissions by the amounts needed to avoid dangerous levels of global warming, says Unep report...
15-11-2017 23:26
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(979)
monckton wrote:
World on track for 3C of warming under current global climate pledges, warns UN
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/03/world-on-track-for-3c-of-warming-under-current-global-climate-pledges-warns-un

Current climate commitments are insufficient to reduce emissions by the amounts needed to avoid dangerous levels of global warming, says Unep report...


Wait a minute! I thought there was already deadly consequences happening now! You guys need to get your stories straight before telling any more lies.
16-11-2017 01:04
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(406)
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.
Edited on 16-11-2017 01:05
16-11-2017 01:50
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.


What's the matter commy? Can't take people calling you on your constant lies?

We've already heard from NASA that we couldn't possibly do anything to stop deadly climate change. Now your telling us that if we don't do something NOW that there will be consequences?

Hey, if man-made climate change is real, it's already too late. So anything from you is just noise from the peanut gallery.
16-11-2017 12:50
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(406)
Wake wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.


What's the matter commy? Can't take people calling you on your constant lies?

We've already heard from NASA that we couldn't possibly do anything to stop deadly climate change. Now your telling us that if we don't do something NOW that there will be consequences?

Hey, if man-made climate change is real, it's already too late. So anything from you is just noise from the peanut gallery.


I'm not here to change anything I'm not that stupid any more.
I'm just posting honest truths regardless and trying to get a few good jokes in on the way down - I mean you never know, maybe there is a God.
Not looking likely though is it?

I'm with these guys ...

SOME MAJOR CLIMATE SCIENTISTS ARE DEPRESSED, DOES THAT MEAN WE'RE 'F---ED'?
http://www.mtv.com/news/2214779/climate-scientists-depressed/
16-11-2017 14:53
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(979)
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....
16-11-2017 16:29
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
monckton wrote:
Wake wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.


What's the matter commy? Can't take people calling you on your constant lies?

We've already heard from NASA that we couldn't possibly do anything to stop deadly climate change. Now your telling us that if we don't do something NOW that there will be consequences?

Hey, if man-made climate change is real, it's already too late. So anything from you is just noise from the peanut gallery.


I'm not here to change anything I'm not that stupid any more.
I'm just posting honest truths regardless and trying to get a few good jokes in on the way down - I mean you never know, maybe there is a God.
Not looking likely though is it?

I'm with these guys ...

SOME MAJOR CLIMATE SCIENTISTS ARE DEPRESSED, DOES THAT MEAN WE'RE 'F---ED'?
http://www.mtv.com/news/2214779/climate-scientists-depressed/


You are here for one reason alone - to try to propagandize this group. To try and hide the fact that the US was THE ONLY country in the world that was required to take ANY actions on AGW and we are no longer limited by that ignorant policy of Obama's and the UN.

China isn't installing exhaust scrubbers in order to have ANY effect on the climate but to stop poisoning their own cities with particulates. China isn't making the slightest effort to do ANYTHING about AGW and in fact are increasing their construction efforts for new power plants that use coal.
16-11-2017 17:19
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: China.... are(sic) increasing their construction efforts for new power plants that use coal.
For 20 years, communist china (always small letters) had plans for 1000 coal plants. At one point, they were ahead of schedule. At another point, they were behind that schedule. At whatever point, communist china (always small letters) sends a lot of their pollution to the U.S. As much as 15% to 30% of pollution on west coast U.S. lands comes from communist china (always small letters).
Edited on 16-11-2017 17:23
16-11-2017 17:21
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
GasGuzzler wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.
16-11-2017 17:31
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: Litebeer? He/she is the master...
Ya wooda been accurate ifn ya had stopped at that point. But, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" continually proves itself to be an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener.
16-11-2017 17:32
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(406)
Wake wrote:

You are here for one reason alone - to try to propagandize this group. To try and hide the fact that the US was THE ONLY country in the world that was required to take ANY actions on AGW and we are no longer limited by that ignorant policy of Obama's and the UN.

China isn't installing exhaust scrubbers in order to have ANY effect on the climate but to stop poisoning their own cities with particulates. China isn't making the slightest effort to do ANYTHING about AGW and in fact are increasing their construction efforts for new power plants that use coal.


I am here to mock you with reality.

As they say in China, a straight foot is not afraid of a crooked shoe!

Climate pledge puts China on course to peak emissions as early as 2027
https://www.carbonbrief.org/climate-pledge-puts-china-on-course-to-peak-emissions-as-early-as-2027

China Cancels 103 Coal Plants, Mindful of Smog and Wasted Capacity
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/world/asia/china-coal-power-plants-pollution.html

Why China Does Capitalism Better than the U.S.
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2043235,00.html
Edited on 16-11-2017 17:35
16-11-2017 18:04
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
James_ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.


And it is probably wise to ignore this entire thread anymore.

We've missed you. Hopefully you've been studying the sciences and learned that not only do we not have any capability of generating the long term climate temperatures that NASA and NOAA lately claim (in 1978 NASA claimed that after careful analysis they could find NO unusual weather which would lead to the claim of AGW) Starting in 1978 we had satellite MGT which totally contradicts the NASA and NOAA claims from what turns out to be analysis from ground temperature monitoring stations that DO NOT EXIST!

From the time of the satellite monitoring the ground stations went from over 6,000 to 1,500 world wide. And these almost entirely in the US.
16-11-2017 22:37
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed:... wise to ignore....
It is not wise to ignore the threats of "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up".
16-11-2017 23:38
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.


And it is probably wise to ignore this entire thread anymore.

We've missed you. Hopefully you've been studying the sciences and learned that not only do we not have any capability of generating the long term climate temperatures that NASA and NOAA lately claim (in 1978 NASA claimed that after careful analysis they could find NO unusual weather which would lead to the claim of AGW) Starting in 1978 we had satellite MGT which totally contradicts the NASA and NOAA claims from what turns out to be analysis from ground temperature monitoring stations that DO NOT EXIST!

From the time of the satellite monitoring the ground stations went from over 6,000 to 1,500 world wide. And these almost entirely in the US.


Thanks Wake. Remember the thread where I posted the graph from NOAA showing that the oceans were warming and not our atmosphere ?
You're probably too young to remember but in the 1970's ozone depletion (insert ItN's ozone levels can't change here) was the cause of warming. And as I mentioned to ItN, posting in here has helped me to better understand my own views on climate change.
And I know you're not big on theoretical physics but the information being made known suggests that stratospheric ozone or oxygen (O2) (Chapman cycle) has a longer lasting cycle than previously believed.
In the next couple of days I'll post some information about ozone. I might also go more into the history of CO2 and climate change. They're actually 2 different things. And with this, it might require watching a documentary or 2, maybe 3 or 4 to understand the climate change argument better. And as I've mentioned to about everyone in Ky., is climate change worth getting it right ? I think it is.
16-11-2017 23:53
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.


And it is probably wise to ignore this entire thread anymore.

We've missed you. Hopefully you've been studying the sciences and learned that not only do we not have any capability of generating the long term climate temperatures that NASA and NOAA lately claim (in 1978 NASA claimed that after careful analysis they could find NO unusual weather which would lead to the claim of AGW) Starting in 1978 we had satellite MGT which totally contradicts the NASA and NOAA claims from what turns out to be analysis from ground temperature monitoring stations that DO NOT EXIST!

From the time of the satellite monitoring the ground stations went from over 6,000 to 1,500 world wide. And these almost entirely in the US.


Thanks Wake. Remember the thread where I posted the graph from NOAA showing that the oceans were warming and not our atmosphere ?
You're probably too young to remember but in the 1970's ozone depletion (insert ItN's ozone levels can't change here) was the cause of warming. And as I mentioned to ItN, posting in here has helped me to better understand my own views on climate change.
And I know you're not big on theoretical physics but the information being made known suggests that stratospheric ozone or oxygen (O2) (Chapman cycle) has a longer lasting cycle than previously believed.
In the next couple of days I'll post some information about ozone. I might also go more into the history of CO2 and climate change. They're actually 2 different things. And with this, it might require watching a documentary or 2, maybe 3 or 4 to understand the climate change argument better. And as I've mentioned to about everyone in Ky., is climate change worth getting it right ? I think it is.


Tell me, wouldn't you expect the oceans to be warming after the little ice age froze a large portion of the northern hemisphere? There are 326 million cubic miles of oceans on this planet. Why would you speak of these things as if you KNEW what they meant?

In the 1970's I had already held jobs in nuclear physics at Physics International and medical instrumentation such as the first practical heart/lung machine. Growing up my best friend had just gotten out of the American concentration camps put in place by that wonderful Franklin D. Roosevelt. I'm a Vietnam vet remember? Or is that too much of a stretch for you?

I know that you refuse to believe simple chemistry but ozone requires only UV radiation and oxygen. CO2 has no effect on that.

If you think that it's worth getting Climate Change right you might consider that educating yourself on the facts is a good starting point.
17-11-2017 00:58
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: ...you speak of these things as if you KNEW what they meant?
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" speaks as if it knows old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threateners.
17-11-2017 01:39
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: ...you speak of these things as if you KNEW what they meant?
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" speaks as if it knows old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threateners.


"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: ...

Tell me, wouldn't you expect the oceans to be warming after the little ice age froze a large portion of the northern hemisphere?


Wake, read your ow words, Northern Hemisphere. Deep fault and thermal vents along the north Atlantic and Gakkel Ridges explains this.
Please remember that AGW encompasses waste heat and ozone depletion. And while scientists say that they are 85% certain that man has an influence on climate change they are not saying CO2, they are saying what man does.
The graph shows a relationship between population and warming.
Attached image:


Edited on 17-11-2017 02:03
17-11-2017 15:50
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
James_ wrote:
Tell me, wouldn't you expect the oceans to be warming after the little ice age froze a large portion of the northern hemisphere?


Wake, read your ow words, Northern Hemisphere. Deep fault and thermal vents along the north Atlantic and Gakkel Ridges explains this.
Please remember that AGW encompasses waste heat and ozone depletion. And while scientists say that they are 85% certain that man has an influence on climate change they are not saying CO2, they are saying what man does.
The graph shows a relationship between population and warming.


James, I wrote them, I don't need you to point out what you believe to be a problem.

You see a connection between increasing CO2 and increasing population? That's nice.

You see a connection between increasing temperature and increasing CO2? Sorry but there is no connection.

Firstly, we aren't sure there IS any warming. NASA before 1978 said that they could find no changes in the temperature curves that are beyond the totally normal chaotic swings of weather.

After 2002 they began showing this HUGE increases in temperature. The problem with this is that they no longer had 6500 ground temperature monitoring stations - they only have 1,000 and almost all of them are in the USA. They are showing huge areas of the globe heating where they have NO monitoring stations - the computer climate modeling programs they have WILL NOT MODEL WHAT HAS HAPPENED. How do you expect them to monitor what will happen in another 30 years?

And on top of all of this the satellite data doesn't show any significant heating. Or you can play greenman's game and see a five year period where it heated and proclaim that demonstrates climate change.

Secondly, things that appear to be happening in tandem don't have to be connected in any manner other than through the main sort of energy on Earth - the Sun. And Dr. Willie Soon's graph shows that the temperature of the Earth over the last 50 years or so almost perfectly matches the temperature swings on the Earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YMttEhtgpk

The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.
17-11-2017 19:24
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.


And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?
17-11-2017 19:45
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.


And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?


How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?
17-11-2017 22:22
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.


And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?


How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?


Unfortunately I don't believe anything in your post. As for this, it reminds me of how many times I asked ItN if he were stoned when he was posting.
Wake wrote:Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about.
17-11-2017 23:48
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.


And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?


How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?


Unfortunately I don't believe anything in your post. As for this, it reminds me of how many times I asked ItN if he were stoned when he was posting.
Wake wrote:Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about.


http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/17/climate-change-alarmists-appear-immunized-against-reality/#disqus_thread

Because you chose not to believe me doesn't mean that you're right about anything and that I'm wrong about the things I have worked directly with.

The oceans are warming and you are trying to fit volcanism into that. They provide far less than 1% of the energy than that absorbed from the sun and you want to use volcanism and particulate pollution. So where in hell do you get the idea that volcanism would be even suspicious? That's like saying that your pot of boiling water on the stove is being heated by the 40 watt light bulb in the lamp across the room. Try and look at your ideas first from a logical point of view.

You COULD have a point if you were talking about the Pangian continents which were thought to have been separated into separate continents because of volcanism of abnormally large size. But nothing was around at that time that even resembled mammals of the sort that evolved into homo-sapiens. Man and man-like precursors are only 600 to 700 thousands years old. Neanderthal was located along the entire European and Asian front as the ice age retreated. Homo-sapiens appears to have evolved in several locations separately. This means that a precursor species was very widespread as well.

The world has survived a very long time without the egotistical human tried to make himself the center of the universe.
18-11-2017 01:36
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: Because you chose not to believe me ....
I chose NOT to leave this website so I can show the ****, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener.
28-11-2017 15:51
Wake
★★★★★
(3368)
James_ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.


The socialists are now dead in the water and do not have a single chance of ever becoming central in the government again. They actually believed that they were going to build a communism of America.

It is really important that you realize that socialism is not a human trait. People want to KEEP what they work for. So it requires a stronger and stronger government to force them to give up the majority of what they have earned.

So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies. In China and Russia they murdered millions and millions in order to instill enough fear among their citizens to obey the government without question. This is what monckton is in love with. He believes that in a socialism he would be one of the elite and receive special treatment when in fact he would be one of the first on the firing line. Just the postings he has placed here would have him hanging from a rope at the first blush of a socialist government.

But enough of that. You said you require an operation. Perhaps you might tell me what it is? The most common surgeries are cataract surgeries. I just had one myself. Next most common are replacement of joints. If this is the case you absolutely MUST follow your physical therapist's advice 100%. Doing so pretty much guarantees a very good outcome. My brother is living in great pain 24 hours a day because he is afraid to get his knees replaced while my cousin had his done and obeyed the therapist and walks almost totally normal and with no pain whatsoever.

Perhaps you have something a great deal more serious and if so I wish you the best possible outcome.
28-11-2017 18:48
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(406)
Well, if we're allowed to mine this turdfield from weeks back here's my sixpence.

Wake wrote:
How many times does it have to be explained James? ... When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.


Sounds like quite a gizmo.
Last time they loaded one of them onto the back of a truck was when Ayn Rand upgraded her dildo from steam.
Here's a pic of Ronald Reagan mustering up the courage to touch the old one.
Spit on it and give it a rub - and you're in.



I like this bit ...

Wake wrote:So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies.


At the risk of descending to a debate, can I ask you - can you give us any current examples of this terrible outcome - an oligarchy?

Here's a clue ...

oligarchy - noun - a small group of people having control of a country or organization.
Edited on 28-11-2017 19:15
28-11-2017 19:32
Into the Night
★★★★★
(5278)
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.


And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?


How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Science is not pay. For all anyone knows you did all that as a technician, not a scientist.
Wake wrote:
Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Since you don't seem to understand why you are violating the 2nd law of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann laws with your models, I would say you have never done the real thing. Since you don't seem to get the mathematics behind statistical analysis I would say you don't know several branches of mathematics either. James is just worse at it.
Wake wrote:
Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?

Science isn't a college or a university. Science does not require credentials of any kind. Dropping to your usual mantras from the Church of Global Warming does not help your case.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with amateur scientists. They have managed to contribute several important theories to science.


The Parrot Killer
28-11-2017 19:37
Into the Night
★★★★★
(5278)
Wake wrote:
James_ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?
Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!
And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.
I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.


The socialists are now dead in the water and do not have a single chance of ever becoming central in the government again. They actually believed that they were going to build a communism of America.
Don't bet on it. Although a lot of people are aware of it now and have turned away fromit, that threat remains. Don't get complacent about it.
Wake wrote:
It is really important that you realize that socialism is not a human trait. People want to KEEP what they work for. So it requires a stronger and stronger government to force them to give up the majority of what they have earned.

So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies. In China and Russia they murdered millions and millions in order to instill enough fear among their citizens to obey the government without question. This is what monckton is in love with. He believes that in a socialism he would be one of the elite and receive special treatment when in fact he would be one of the first on the firing line. Just the postings he has placed here would have him hanging from a rope at the first blush of a socialist government.

Ugly as it is, it IS a human trait. So is theft and murder.
Wake wrote:
But enough of that. You said you require an operation. Perhaps you might tell me what it is? The most common surgeries are cataract surgeries. I just had one myself. Next most common are replacement of joints. If this is the case you absolutely MUST follow your physical therapist's advice 100%. Doing so pretty much guarantees a very good outcome. My brother is living in great pain 24 hours a day because he is afraid to get his knees replaced while my cousin had his done and obeyed the therapist and walks almost totally normal and with no pain whatsoever.

Perhaps you have something a great deal more serious and if so I wish you the best possible outcome.

He actually already described what his surgery was about.


The Parrot Killer
28-11-2017 19:42
Into the Night
★★★★★
(5278)
monckton wrote:
Well, if we're allowed to mine this turdfield from weeks back here's my sixpence.

Wake wrote:
How many times does it have to be explained James? ... When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.


Sounds like quite a gizmo.
Last time they loaded one of them onto the back of a truck was when Ayn Rand upgraded her dildo from steam.
Here's a pic of Ronald Reagan mustering up the courage to touch the old one.
Spit on it and give it a rub - and you're in.



I like this bit ...

Wake wrote:So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies.


At the risk of descending to a debate, can I ask you - can you give us any current examples of this terrible outcome - an oligarchy?

Here's a clue ...

oligarchy - noun - a small group of people having control of a country or organization.


Certainly. The USSR. China. Certain elements of the United States (those elements that have left the Constitution) such as the Dept of Education, the EPA, certain elements of the FCC, certain elements of the FAA, the Federal Reserve, the Supreme Court, several district courts. There are other examples.


The Parrot Killer
28-11-2017 21:46
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
oligarchy:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed: Certainly. The USSR. China.....There are other examples.
.... like old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners, who concentrate on such, without science chemistry astronomy physics algebra & pre-calc in poorly (or un-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.




Join the debate Climate change is simple: David Roberts:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Simple thermodynamics for climate sceptics3914-05-2017 00:25
Just one simple question3604-01-2017 17:58
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact