Climate change is simple: David Roberts

monckton wrote:
World on track for 3C of warming under current global climate pledges, warns UN
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/03/world-on-track-for-3c-of-warming-under-current-global-climate-pledges-warns-un

Current climate commitments are insufficient to reduce emissions by the amounts needed to avoid dangerous levels of global warming, says Unep report...

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.

Wake wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.

What's the matter commy? Can't take people calling you on your constant lies?

We've already heard from NASA that we couldn't possibly do anything to stop deadly climate change. Now your telling us that if we don't do something NOW that there will be consequences?

Hey, if man-made climate change is real, it's already too late. So anything from you is just noise from the peanut gallery.

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Others can read and move on.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.

monckton wrote:

Wake wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.
Others can read and move on.
There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.
Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

I want my jokes back.

What's the matter commy? Can't take people calling you on your constant lies?

We've already heard from NASA that we couldn't possibly do anything to stop deadly climate change. Now your telling us that if we don't do something NOW that there will be consequences?

Hey, if man-made climate change is real, it's already too late. So anything from you is just noise from the peanut gallery.

I'm not here to change anything I'm not that stupid any more.
I'm just posting honest truths regardless and trying to get a few good jokes in on the way down - I mean you never know, maybe there is a God.
Not looking likely though is it?

I'm with these guys ...

SOME MAJOR CLIMATE SCIENTISTS ARE DEPRESSED, DOES THAT MEAN WE'RE 'F---ED'?
http://www.mtv.com/news/2214779/climate-scientists-depressed/

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: China.... are(sic) increasing their construction efforts for new power plants that use coal.

GasGuzzler wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?

Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!

And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.

I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener gazzzed & guzzzling" gushed: Litebeer? He/she is the master...

Wake wrote:

You are here for one reason alone - to try to propagandize this group. To try and hide the fact that the US was THE ONLY country in the world that was required to take ANY actions on AGW and we are no longer limited by that ignorant policy of Obama's and the UN.

China isn't installing exhaust scrubbers in order to have ANY effect on the climate but to stop poisoning their own cities with particulates. China isn't making the slightest effort to do ANYTHING about AGW and in fact are increasing their construction efforts for new power plants that use coal.

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?

Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!

And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.

I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed:... wise to ignore....

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?

Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!

And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.

I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.

And it is probably wise to ignore this entire thread anymore.

We've missed you. Hopefully you've been studying the sciences and learned that not only do we not have any capability of generating the long term climate temperatures that NASA and NOAA lately claim (in 1978 NASA claimed that after careful analysis they could find NO unusual weather which would lead to the claim of AGW) Starting in 1978 we had satellite MGT which totally contradicts the NASA and NOAA claims from what turns out to be analysis from ground temperature monitoring stations that DO NOT EXIST!

From the time of the satellite monitoring the ground stations went from over 6,000 to 1,500 world wide. And these almost entirely in the US.

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?

Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!

And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.

I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.

And it is probably wise to ignore this entire thread anymore.

We've missed you. Hopefully you've been studying the sciences and learned that not only do we not have any capability of generating the long term climate temperatures that NASA and NOAA lately claim (in 1978 NASA claimed that after careful analysis they could find NO unusual weather which would lead to the claim of AGW) Starting in 1978 we had satellite MGT which totally contradicts the NASA and NOAA claims from what turns out to be analysis from ground temperature monitoring stations that DO NOT EXIST!

From the time of the satellite monitoring the ground stations went from over 6,000 to 1,500 world wide. And these almost entirely in the US.

Thanks Wake. Remember the thread where I posted the graph from NOAA showing that the oceans were warming and not our atmosphere ?
You're probably too young to remember but in the 1970's ozone depletion (insert ItN's ozone levels can't change here) was the cause of warming. And as I mentioned to ItN, posting in here has helped me to better understand my own views on climate change.
And I know you're not big on theoretical physics but the information being made known suggests that stratospheric ozone or oxygen (O2) (Chapman cycle) has a longer lasting cycle than previously believed.
In the next couple of days I'll post some information about ozone. I might also go more into the history of CO2 and climate change. They're actually 2 different things. And with this, it might require watching a documentary or 2, maybe 3 or 4 to understand the climate change argument better. And as I've mentioned to about everyone in Ky., is climate change worth getting it right ? I think it is.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: ...you speak of these things as if you KNEW what they meant?

litesong wrote:

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: ...you speak of these things as if you KNEW what they meant?

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener wake-me-up" speaks as if it knows old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threateners.

Tell me, wouldn't you expect the oceans to be warming after the little ice age froze a large portion of the northern hemisphere?

James_ wrote:

Tell me, wouldn't you expect the oceans to be warming after the little ice age froze a large portion of the northern hemisphere?

Wake, read your ow words, Northern Hemisphere. Deep fault and thermal vents along the north Atlantic and Gakkel Ridges explains this.
Please remember that AGW encompasses waste heat and ozone depletion. And while scientists say that they are 85% certain that man has an influence on climate change they are not saying CO2, they are saying what man does.
The graph shows a relationship between population and warming.

Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.

And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.

And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?

How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?

Wake wrote:Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about.

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.

And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?

How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?

Unfortunately I don't believe anything in your post. As for this, it reminds me of how many times I asked ItN if he were stoned when he was posting.

Wake wrote:Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener wake-me-up" wiffed: Because you chose not to believe me ....

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?

Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!

And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.

I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.

Wake wrote:
How many times does it have to be explained James? ... When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Wake wrote:So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies.

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:


The problem with amateur scientists is that they end up with amateur conclusions.

And you're an amateur scientist, right Wake ?

How many times does it have to be explained James? When you are paid to work in science you are a professional. When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Wake wrote:
Because you do not work in science you think that if you collaborate with other scientists you don't know what you're talking about. You do not have a clear vision of science because you have not done the real thing.

Wake wrote:
Rather than doing anything you can to seem smart why don't you actually study science? I don't know where you live but colleges are everywhere. There are even on-line colleges in which you can gain real scientific knowledge instead of inventing it as you go along. If even nightmare can accurately criticize your positions they have to be pretty far off the mark don't you think?

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

monckton wrote:
It's not for you.

Why? Not a fan of being challenged to back up your drivel?

Others can read and move on.

They certainly will. Nothing to see really.

There's about 6 regular posters on this global forum - I did wonder.

This is about the only climate site I know of that is not moderated. No one gets banned for their beliefs. Greenthing is still here!

And Litebeer? He/she is the master copynpaster, usually nothing to do with the current topic...very short attention span with no real knowledge of anything except for how to milk the gov for a paycheck. So, you're more than welcome here. Keep talking. It is my life mission to try and figure out how it is you communists/socialist can actually live with yourselves and your parasite tendencies.

Thought I'd go deep but jesus.

Go for it. I'd be interested.

I want my jokes back.

You've still got your two biggest jokes....
1. Global warming.

2. Your cock.....

Anymore I like the fact it's not moderated. People can choose to ignore what they want.

The socialists are now dead in the water and do not have a single chance of ever becoming central in the government again. They actually believed that they were going to build a communism of America.

Wake wrote:
It is really important that you realize that socialism is not a human trait. People want to KEEP what they work for. So it requires a stronger and stronger government to force them to give up the majority of what they have earned.

So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies. In China and Russia they murdered millions and millions in order to instill enough fear among their citizens to obey the government without question. This is what monckton is in love with. He believes that in a socialism he would be one of the elite and receive special treatment when in fact he would be one of the first on the firing line. Just the postings he has placed here would have him hanging from a rope at the first blush of a socialist government.

Wake wrote:
But enough of that. You said you require an operation. Perhaps you might tell me what it is? The most common surgeries are cataract surgeries. I just had one myself. Next most common are replacement of joints. If this is the case you absolutely MUST follow your physical therapist's advice 100%. Doing so pretty much guarantees a very good outcome. My brother is living in great pain 24 hours a day because he is afraid to get his knees replaced while my cousin had his done and obeyed the therapist and walks almost totally normal and with no pain whatsoever.

Perhaps you have something a great deal more serious and if so I wish you the best possible outcome.

monckton wrote:
Well, if we're allowed to mine this turdfield from weeks back here's my sixpence.

Wake wrote:
How many times does it have to be explained James? ... When you are paid to calculate the expansion factor of the aorta you are working in science. When you get paid to develop instruments to detect HIV in the world's blood banking system you are a scientist. When you are paid to develop a working poison gas detector for the military of the US you are a scientist. When you are paid to increase the power of the Berkeley linear accelerator you are a scientist.

Sounds like quite a gizmo.
Last time they loaded one of them onto the back of a truck was when Ayn Rand upgraded her dildo from steam.
Here's a pic of Ronald Reagan mustering up the courage to touch the old one.
Spit on it and give it a rub - and you're in.



I like this bit ...

Wake wrote:So ALL socialisms will devolve to dictatorships or oligarchies.

At the risk of descending to a debate, can I ask you - can you give us any current examples of this terrible outcome - an oligarchy?

Here's a clue ...

oligarchy - noun - a small group of people having control of a country or organization.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed: Certainly. The USSR. China.....There are other examples.